poor r1+r2 reading

[telectrix]

a bit more pedantry for the afficionados. these cables are not Rings, so r1 an r2 do not apply. R1 and R2 would however be relevant.

 

[buzzlightyear]

yes thanks for that i will check them out tomorrow perhaps i should have just mentioned the cable concerned but i just wanted to put people in the picture

i will put the popcorn in the microwave ready for tomorrow just in case if we going to the pictures .lol..

 

[IAmSparkytus!]

How did you get on with this OP?

 

[robinw]

How did you get on with this OP?

Thanks for asking did a bit of revision and tested it myself and got 0.9 so i must have got the cable length wrong ,it was very obvious that the guy testing had not removed the cables from the consumer unit which i am assuming skewed his reading . Rang him and all he said was ok i will amend the report!

 

[PEG]

I think we all know that the true answer to this question,is 42 ?

 

[IAmSparkytus!]

I think we all know that the true answer to this question,is 42 ?

Is this some sort of riddle? Been trying to figure it out for 12 hours now to no avail

 

[DPG]

Is this some sort of riddle? Been trying to figure it out for 12 hours now to no avail

Hitch Hiker's Guide.

 

[Intoelectrics]

a bit more pedantry for the afficionados. these cables are not Rings, so r1 an r2 do not apply. R1 and R2 would however be relevant.

This was something (along with most of the op) that was confusing me also. I couldn't fathom what was being asked. At least now we have some idea.