Price To Replace Board And Rewire

[Octopus]

What happened to Kate?

 

[Spoon]

Don't know Murdoch. How many females to we have on here, that actually post?

 

[Englishman]

Mythbusters did a section on who was the better drivers, men or women. Turned out it was pretty even.

Women's accidents just tend to cost less, that's all.

 

[telectrix]

Women's accidents just tend to cost less, that's all.

that's because they don't need expensive hire cars in the kitchen. :death:

 

[Jay Sparks]

There is a colleague at work that is very PC. She doesn't like stereo typing, or any kind of discrimination, she really preaches it too as part of her job. But in her office she has a flyer that says, "Lady only taxi's" and another one saying "Lady only Mechanics"!!! Oh the irony!!lol

Although I do remember a Yorkie advert a few years ago. At the end of the add a deep male voice said, "It's not for girls"...or something to that effect.

Jay

 

[Englishman]

There is a colleague at work that is very PC. She doesn't like stereo typing, or any kind of discrimination, she really preaches it too as part of her job. But in her office she has a flyer that says, "Lady only taxi's" and another one saying "Lady only Mechanics"!!! Oh the irony!!lol

Although I do remember a Yorkie advert a few years ago. At the end of the add a deep male voice said, "It's not for girls"...or something to that effect.

Jay

They don't see it when it's the other way round. I remember Harriet Harman on one of the Sunday politics shows a few months back, and she was bleating on about equality at the top of government. She was asked if the prime minister was a male, does there have to be a female second in command "absolutely" she replied. He then said, "if the prime minister is a woman, does there have to be a male second in command then?" Her reply was "not necessarily..." And that, as far as I'm concerned, renders her entire argument dead. Same as the "civil (black)" rights movement, it's not equality that they want, it's superiority, and constant recognition.

 

[sean_ork]

Same as the "civil (black)" rights movement, it's not equality that they want, it's superiority, and constant recognition.

BS, utter BS - and you know it.

 

[Englishman]

Might have guessed that you'd pop up.

 

[GMES]

They don't see it when it's the other way round. I remember Harriet Harman on one of the Sunday politics shows a few months back, and she was bleating on about equality at the top of government. She was asked if the prime minister was a male, does there have to be a female second in command "absolutely" she replied. He then said, "if the prime minister is a woman, does there have to be a male second in command then?" Her reply was "not necessarily..." And that, as far as I'm concerned, renders her entire argument dead. Same as the "civil (black)" rights movement, it's not equality that they want, it's superiority, and constant recognition.

BS, utter BS - and you know it.

Guys we have a politics section if needed please don't turn this thread into one, cheers.

 

[Leigh88]

Thank you all for your replies. Sounds to me like he's doing a good deal

 

[hightower]

Thank you all for your replies. Sounds to me like he's doing a good deal

That might be so, but as others have already asked: is he going to provide the correct certs/BC notification?