PV and not and RCD protection. | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss PV and not and RCD protection. in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Bsharp

-
Joined
Feb 15, 2011
Messages
104
Reaction score
30
Had a customer ask for RCD to be changed to Type A as he has had a company install a PV unit which they have left with the spur switched off as new regulations state that PV units must have a type A RCD 🤔. Has anybody else had this situation??
 
As mentioned above, If PV is connected to a shared RCD or a spur off an RCBO protected circuit that serves other things, then a unique situation arises where the RCD/RCBO might meet disconnection times but the PV back-fed supply can be present for longer than those disconnection times making the additional protection unreliable/non-compliant.
The PV inverter is obliged to turn off if there is no incoming supply, for safety, but it can take up to 1/2 a second to do this. So how it is connected needs careful consideration which it doesn't sound like has happened.
 
PV should not be connected to a spur at all.
It should be connected to its own dedicated way at the CU and not be connected to an RCD which protects any other circuits.
Hi Dave thanks for the reply, my original post was slightly vague and in all honesty a little misleading, but this is the message I received for the “PV” installer via the client.
In actual fact what has been installed is a PIV unit (Envirovent to be precise) I can only presume that the installer has PV (photovoltaics) and PIV (positive input ventilation) regulations confused because as I thought exactly the same as yourself.
 
Correct James.
I am always correct,
no,
I am nearly always correct,
hmmm, no,

I am often correct, this could be possible unless I am in discussion with my wife.
I think it best that I consider myself WRONG until I get confirmation from her that wears the trousers as to either how wrong I am or that I might be right on this occasion.

Hi Dave thanks for the reply, my original post was slightly vague and in all honesty a little misleading, but this is the message I received for the “PV” installer via the client.
In actual fact what has been installed is a PIV unit (Envirovent to be precise) I can only presume that the installer has PV (photovoltaics) and PIV (positive input ventilation) regulations confused because as I thought exactly the same as yourself.

So generally speaking the PIV unit requires NO RCD at all.
Of course this is BS in most applications because the cable supplying it may need it, however not always.
I think the installer needs a little education and i don't mean 10 minutes on you tube!!
 
I am always correct,
no,
I am nearly always correct,
hmmm, no,

I am often correct, this could be possible unless I am in discussion with my wife.
I think it best that I consider myself WRONG until I get confirmation from her that wears the trousers as to either how wrong I am or that I might be right on this occasion.



So generally speaking the PIV unit requires NO RCD at all.
Of course this is BS in most applications because the cable supplying it may need it, however not always.
I think the installer needs a little education and i don't mean 10 minutes on you tube!!
Unbelievable isn’t it!! Looks like I’ll h e an awkward phone call tomorrow attempting to educate whoever on the correct terminology and usage of RCDs, can’t wait 🤣🤣.
 
unless this is a big organisation or a seasoned spark that should know better (I know we all should know better)
don't be to hard on them, remember when you first started out?
There were things that you got wrong and a word from a more educated or time served spark would point you in the right direction.
of course if arrogant or know it all then give both barrels!!!
 
unless this is a big organisation or a seasoned spark that should know better (I know we all should know better)
don't be to hard on them, remember when you first started out?
There were things that you got wrong and a word from a more educated or time served spark would point you in the right direction.
of course if arrogant or know it all then give both barrels!!!
100% agree on both points.
 
Nothing wrong with complying with what is a simple request. So long as you can get a compatible RCBO. I have just rewired a couple of flats (complete refurb) and PV was installed. The installer insisted I supply SPD as he can't sign off his work without it. I did think well put one in then it's your job do it completely. However those employing my services were willing to pay me to do it so I did it as it was just an hour if that and the cost of the SPD. First I have heard of this?
 
unless this is a big organisation or a seasoned spark that should know better (I know we all should know better)
don't be to hard on them, remember when you first started out?
There were things that you got wrong and a word from a more educated or time served spark would point you in the right direction.
of course if arrogant or know it all then give both barrels!!!
Just had word off client it turns out it is actually Envirovent who installed the PIV. So a fairly big organisation me thinks.
To be fair I could just got the RCD as requested but don’t like charging customers for works not required.
 
Nothing wrong with complying with what is a simple request. So long as you can get a compatible RCBO. I have just rewired a couple of flats (complete refurb) and PV was installed. The installer insisted I supply SPD as he can't sign off his work without it. I did think well put one in then it's your job do it completely. However those employing my services were willing to pay me to do it so I did it as it was just an hour if that and the cost of the SPD. First I have heard of this?
Thanks for reply appreciated 👍This is actually a PIV unit (poss pressure ventilation) I think that’s where the confusion has arisen. Surely SPD should be installed anyway on complete rewire?
 
Not on my watch if I can possibly avoid an SPD. Really, Anyway never mind about that. The fact is if you put it to the client and they refuse then no, unless it is HMO or valuables etc. PIV, ok, if they think that A type is required does this mean they are worried about D.C. leakage? And, if so, why did they not do it as part of the job. A bit rich doing the install knowing this and then not switching on as the installation is not compliant! If they knew that they should have made it clear up front. This is a very underhand practice.
Anyhow, the work is required as they will not commission without it. Let the customer challenge this approach to business. Take it to trading standards. Technically, they have installed a non-compliant (regs wise) installation, by their own mouths!
 
Last edited:

Reply to PV and not and RCD protection. in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

News and Offers from Sponsors

  • Article
Merry Xmas to all :D
    • Friendly
    • Like
Replies
8
Views
439
  • Article
Join us at electronica 2024 in Munich! Since 1964, electronica has been the premier event for technology enthusiasts and industry professionals...
    • Like
Replies
0
Views
747
  • Sticky
  • Article
Thanks so much for sharing this with us! I’ll definitely take a look, it seems like there are a lot of useful and interesting products. The idea...
    • Like
Replies
5
Views
2K

Similar threads

Hi all. Try to keep this nice and short. Had an EICR fail on a health centre due to corrosion on main supply which was causing high Ze values...
Replies
0
Views
186
Seen this where T&E has been fixed with a flat bend of too tight a radius.
2 3
Replies
35
Views
2K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top