Testing.
I know you can do an R2 as oppose to R1+R2.
So, if I decided to take this route how could you check compliance, cheers.
Compliance of what may I ask?
Compliance with disconnection times 0.4 and 5 secs
I am really trying to understand the question. Honest I am. If you can measure R2, why can't you measure R1 and therefore R1+R2? For that matter, if you're going on a wander, why not test all 3 conductors individually?
You need to know your Zs for that.
R2 just shows Earth conductor continuity, or not!![]()
Now......this should be burnt into your mind,
Zs = Ze + (R1 + R2)
Why would you not have access?What if you don't have access to R1 and Rn, that was whole point to the question.
Why would you not have access?
??Because you can touch the outside metal casing to items if they are fixed and for whatever reason can't be accessed, moved or just generally to expensive to get involved with. Common sense no??
Now......this should be burnt into your mind,
Zs = Ze + (R1 + R2)
Yup you have it in one..............best explanation ever well done mate you have it sussed![]()
But you shouldn't subtract Ze from Zs to get (R1 + R2).
Pff and i didnt even get a thank or like
lol, ive learn something then.
Why not? apparently calculated R1+R2 is perfectly acceptable, defo sure i read that in regs if some 1 could help clarify that, cheers.
Do I get a prize for knowing the answer
I'll give you a thank 'and' a like if in your next post you tell me the difference between Zs and Ze...............can't be fairer than that mate.
you have 5 minutes to look it up![]()
Why not? apparently calculated R1+R2 is perfectly acceptable, defo sure i read that in regs if some 1 could help clarify that, cheers.
If you measure R2 this is your confirmation that your cpc is safely connected from the MET to the accessory.
Once you know this and that your IR tests are OK, then you are safe to start live testing.
You would then use Zs to confirm polarity and that your circuit would meet the required disconnection times.
Absolutly not. Love to know where it says that.
Just because R2 is all you need to record does not mean that is all you should test.It is very confusing as on the test sheets it does say R1+R2 OR R2, implying just an R2 would be acceptable. I was scratching my head thinking how is that going to comply with the required times.
??Because you can touch the outside metal casing to items if they are fixed and for whatever reason can't be accessed, moved or just generally to expensive to get involved with. Common sense no??
Well you guys obviously know a lot more than i do, so o.k but isn't there not some exceptions?
Just out of interest how much would you charge for a 10 circuit domestic EICR?
R2 is best used when doing EICR's to light fittings.
For new installation work the R1+R2 is best, then you can confirm polarity at the same time.
As you are changing the consumer unit you have to prove by means of testing that existing circuits are safe to be energised.
Yeah i get that, but
you haven't altard as such any circuits from CU onwards so do you still need to R1+R2?
Would then changing a consumer unit count as new installation work as you are not installing any cables they are existing in regards to R1+R2. Think about what i'm actually asking here instead of getting boot in. (I know it would be an EIC before you start with the funny answers). If you dont get the question just ask me, cheers