RCD/ combined afdd breakers | Page 2 | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss RCD/ combined afdd breakers in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Joined
Jun 24, 2021
Messages
14
Reaction score
4
Location
Sm46rw
Hi can someone tell me whether I need to record the trip times on x1 or x5 on this combined device,as I'm getting trip times of 44/45 ms x1 and sometimes a lot lower ie 29 ms.This device is the sole means of isolation.
Cheers
 
Excuse particularly verbose answer, to try and clear up some confusion here.
Double pole RCBO's with AFD have three elements:
1) over current protection, same as fuse or MCB
2) arc-fault detection
3) RCD protection (earth leakage)

In BS7671 terms:
-fault protection is deemed to be via circuit's cpc, earthing, bonding and the fact that fault would operate the over-current element (same as fuse or normal MCB)
-the RCD element is providing additional protection.

The thing that seems to be causing confusion is that while the whole device is part of the circuit's fault protection, the RCD element is deemed to be additional protection.
I think most of the above is already understood and its just a terminology thing.
all I would like is the maximum mS parameters for x1 and X5 for the rcbo
x1 = 300ms
x5 = 40ms
 
Excuse particularly verbose answer, to try and clear up some confusion here.
Double pole RCBO's with AFD have three elements:
1) over current protection, same as fuse or MCB
2) arc-fault detection
3) RCD protection (earth leakage)

In BS7671 terms:
-fault protection is deemed to be via circuit's cpc, earthing, bonding and the fact that fault would operate the over-current element (same as fuse or normal MCB)
-the RCD element is providing additional protection.

The thing that seems to be causing confusion is that while the whole device is part of the circuit's fault protection, the RCD element is deemed to be additional protection.
I think most of the above is already understood and its just a terminology thing.

x1 = 300ms
x5 = 40ms
Exactly!!!

Just because the combined device (rcd, mcb, & afdd) is the sole protection device, doesn't mean every aspect is the primary protection

The mcb aspect provides ADS.
The rcd aspect only provides additional protection in this case as ADS is provided by the mcb aspect.
The Afdd aspect is again additional protection although not under the same regulation as the rcd aspect.

This is important as when you complete the eicr or eic the rcd additional protection should be ticked and NOT the rcd as fault protection

This latter aspect should only be ticked/used if ADS cannot be provided without use of the rcd.
 
Excuse particularly verbose answer, to try and clear up some confusion here.
Double pole RCBO's with AFD have three elements:
1) over current protection, same as fuse or MCB
2) arc-fault detection
3) RCD protection (earth leakage)

In BS7671 terms:
-fault protection is deemed to be via circuit's cpc, earthing, bonding and the fact that fault would operate the over-current element (same as fuse or normal MCB)
-the RCD element is providing additional protection.

The thing that seems to be causing confusion is that while the whole device is part of the circuit's fault protection, the RCD element is deemed to be additional protection.
I think most of the above is already understood and its just a terminology thing.

x1 = 300ms
x5 = 40ms
Hi Tim
Thank you so much for this ,please can you tell me where these measurements are quoted in the regs book ,and as far as filling in the test sheets ,am I measuring on x1 or X5 .
Regards
 
Hi Tim
Thank you so much for this ,please can you tell me where these measurements are quoted in the regs book ,and as far as filling in the test sheets ,am I measuring on x1 or X5 .
Regards
643.8

Or table 3A (only really applicable to fault protection as only the 40ms aspect is required for additional)
 
Go on then, only because it's Friday....
Regulation 643.8 on page 235 describes testing RCD's, see note underneath for the 40ms.

The time/current criteria they need to come up to relevant standards is in Appendix 3, page 363
 
Go on then, only because it's Friday....
Regulation 643.8 on page 235 describes testing RCD's, see note underneath for the 40ms.

The time/current criteria they need to come up to relevant standards is in Appendix 3, page 363
Many thanks Tim .
Hopefully next time if I have to go on this forum ,I'll try and give as much info as poss.
Regards
 

Reply to RCD/ combined afdd breakers in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar Threads

  • Question
Hi Gingerrubix, The fact that your previous Tenant replaced a faulty socket plate which he used for an external EV, raises an eyebrow. Also your...
2
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • Question
This looks like a decent project to get your teeth into. It may be worth your while looking through the directory on here for your area as your...
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Question
I've just googled the part number and it is indeed adjustable, so you can wind its settings up to stop it tripping for the duration of the test...
2
Replies
25
Views
7K
davesparks
D
Mods, please move to the trainee forum, no replies out here.
Replies
1
Views
2K
B
  • Question
.....Right.....firstly,the obvious. You have not only left it quite late,to design and fit the desired equipment,you have also left it last. Some...
Replies
3
Views
3K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock    No Thanks