Have to say i`m of the same mind as Mark on this one.
& as suggested, a very contentious issue that splits us iinto two groups.
I can easily see Phil` point - it is tempting to just apply the requirements of the 17th Edition to the extended section. But even if the OP feels comfortable ignoring that S/Os need 30mA protection - & many did even under the 16th - you have a responsibility to ensure the supplying cct (the ring) can carry the additional loading. This would be impossible to due without testing the RFC...
because the customer dosent want the added expense of me testing the ring main and installing an RCBO to protect all the sockets.
An average customer then
They wouldn`t have us test anything if it works. But making it work isn`t our job brief - making it work safely is. They won`t understand the significance of RFC testing, but you should. We all know the boiler isn`t gonna add much extra loading, but without testing the cct first, how the hell would you know it isn`t bridged/discontinuous already? Only after establishing its all good can you proceed to deliberate on where to put the RCD.
As Phil said, you must check all Earthing & Bonding is upto at least min requirements.
And why would we go to the trouble? Cos our Part P body says we have to? Cos it can be seen? Hopefully not.
Hopefully,because we understand it must be upto the task asked of it - just like the Ring