What is missing from this discussion is a definition of the word premature, as it is used in the regulation. I don't have a copy of the 18th yet and can't look to see if it's one of those terms that is defined in Part 2.
At some point between the fire starting and the building being entirely consumed, the collapse of the wiring system is not premature - it is inevitable. We'd all look like construction gods if, in the aftermath of an inferno, the wiring was still perfectly in tact while every other trade's work was no longer identifiable. So, at what point is it not premature for the wiring to collapse? Are we talking ourselves into an impossible corner by trying to keep the wiring suspended beyond what is reasonable to expect?
Plumbers are using plastic piping these days, they're just as likely to collapse and cause entanglement issues; are they having this regulation too?
I have no answers, but I'm not sure the discussion has been entirely about the right question.