Review of EICR

[lass_lost]

Dear all professional electricians
This is the report we were sent by our seller. Does this report look okay, especially the readings. If anything is missing I would be grateful if you could point it out.

Thanks

 

[James]

I think you should get your own report done, that looks wrong to me.

 

[littlespark]

Couple of things stand out.

61009 is not a suitable main protective device type.

Mainswitch rating is stated as 100V as well as 100A. Should be 230V

Every measured Zs is exactly the same. (0.68 ohms) This should be different for every circuit….

His C3 coding at the beginning mentions putting surge protection in, but his circuit schedule has a surge device ticked as being present.


Looks like a rush job to me….

Do you know how long they were in the property for?

 

[cireland]

It's also down as a D.C. supply. TN-C-S wjth an earth mat?
There is quite a lot wrong with ir.

 

[PS Electrics]

Dear all professional electricians
This is the report we were sent by our seller. Does this report look okay, especially the readings. If anything is missing I would be grateful if you could point it out.

This report is worthless as per the replies given above. I am suspecting this is a copy and paste job with bits left in from a previous report. ie Earth Mat for details of the Electrode when it is already stated it is TN-C-S and earthing is supplied by the distributer and Earth Electrode is N/A.

As other have said DC for the supply? 100V main Switch and it is apparently only 1 pole.

As stated above readings all the same on different circuits?

Could go on.

 

[westward10]

IR test voltage is quoted as 200 but probably should be 250.
No RCBO readings or types, assuming they are 61009.
No ring final readings.
I suspect the protective devices are 6ka not 10ka.
Has confirmed phase sequence when it is probably single phase.

 

[littlespark]

The list of mistakes is getting longer.

I did notice the IR was “200” on some and “>200” on others, which is more likely. Pointed out by westward above


Also, out of interest, was the overall outcome marked as “SATISFACTORY”? Which is what a single C3 would bring about?


Without being on site ourselves, we can’t say how good the installation actually is, but it’s a sure thing that the report itself is a load of rubbish.

 

[westward10]

According to the schedule circuit 3 is spare with a missing cover, Code 2?

 

[littlespark]

I think we now wait for OP to return.


It’s getting to be a weekly occurrence, someone comes on here with a dodgy EICR.