Safety of Using Adiabatic Method? | Page 2 | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss Safety of Using Adiabatic Method? in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Cookie

-
Joined
Jul 11, 2019
Messages
675
Reaction score
126
Location
Earth
I'm thinking, and while I could be wrong, is the adiabatic method a possible latent safety hazard? As well as undersized CPCs on circuits 32 amps and under?

Normally DNO sources are strong with relatively high PFC, and we have a known Ze value. However, should someone bring a portable generation unit on site after an outage, or a large yet short circuit limited inverter (Tesla Power Ball), Ze values can be such that MCB opening time increases. Such an increase can overheat the CPC, up to the point of melting it.

From a touch voltage perspective I humbly do not see a major concern however, in that 20 x 10 = 200 amps, 1.15 ohms or 46kw- a 46kw load on a 25kw generator would result in a significant drop in the output voltage whereby 230 volts dropping to 110 volts giving 55 volts to remote earth such that a longer disconnection time will not result in organic bodily injury.

However, the risk of fire and shock from an overheating CPC is relevant.

What do others make of this point of view?
 
Table 54.7 is the generic "half phase size, if that is above 16mm, or phase size" rule for cases then you can't use the adiabatic approach (for whatever reason, OCPD unknown or just too much trouble).

In itself is really just a relaxation of the fairly obvious case that is a cable has suitable protection for L-N fault/overload, then the same CPC is fine, and going L-E is (I would hope!) always a fault condition and not overload sort of durations so it can be relaxed a little.

Of course the TN-C-S "open PEN" fault is a clear exception to these assumption hence the additional regs in Table 54.8 that set a lower limit to CPC size so a 6mm (or below) sub-main cable needs additional CPC if bonding to extraneous conductive parts under these conditions.


Agree. The thing is, and its being argued in US forums, that Ze can change over time for several reasons and such device clearing time can change. With a full/half size CPC there is no worry of shock or fire should tripping time increase.
 

Reply to Safety of Using Adiabatic Method? in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

News and Offers from Sponsors

  • Article
Join us at electronica 2024 in Munich! Since 1964, electronica has been the premier event for technology enthusiasts and industry professionals...
    • Like
Replies
0
Views
295
  • Sticky
  • Article
Good to know thanks, one can never have enough places to source parts from!
Replies
4
Views
804
  • Article
OFFICIAL SPONSORS These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then...
Replies
0
Views
839

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top