Settle a small disagreement with me and another sparky | Page 2 | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss Settle a small disagreement with me and another sparky in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net

Sorry lads i forgot to update you all.

basically he agreed with me and we wasnt going to put one in but then the boss came and said basically the niceic have apparently said to him to put any lighting circuit containing a bath or shower on rcd/rcbo so any we find have to be changed to an rcbo so that is what we are doing.

I dont personally beleave the niceic have said this as such a blank statement that they all have to be rcd protected but who am i to argue with the boss.
 
Sorry lads i forgot to update you all.

basically he agreed with me and we wasnt going to put one in but then the boss came and said basically the niceic have apparently said to him to put any lighting circuit containing a bath or shower on rcd/rcbo so any we find have to be changed to an rcbo so that is what we are doing.

I dont personally beleave the niceic have said this as such a blank statement that they all have to be rcd protected but who am i to argue with the boss.

On the basis the NICEIC don't write the regs, did they offer up any reg to support this?
 
Did the existing bathroom have all circuits in the location and all extraneous parts in the location supplementary bonded together?
If so a simple C3 for no rcd protection can be recorded.
Were the NICEIC aware of all the facts before they commented?
 
On the basis the NICEIC don't write the regs, did they offer up any reg to support this?

I honestly dont know, probily not though. he just told me that they said to put rcd protection on all lighting circuits that have a bath/shower. i personally dont beleave him i just think he was sticking up for his golden boy and didnt want him to be proven wrong. i didnt argue with him he told me to put them all on rcbo and as it doesnt make it unsafe i just did it like he asked.
 
Did the existing bathroom have all circuits in the location and all extraneous parts in the location supplementary bonded together?
If so a simple C3 for no rcd protection can be recorded.
Were the NICEIC aware of all the facts before they commented?

as far as im away the niceic told him this about another job he was on and just made the blanket statement they should all be on rcbo/rcd, which i dont beleave.

also yes the supp bonding was in place and every thing and i did give it a C3 but he still told me to change the mcb for a rcbo
 
What happens if you can't fit a compatible rcbo at the board or you have a board for which rcbos do not exist, like Wylex standards.
 
What happens if you can't fit a compatible rcbo at the board or you have a board for which rcbos do not exist, like Wylex standards.

That has not happened yet so i am not sure i presume he would say it needs a board change. but we dont do the board changes it gets passed back to them and there own guys change it so he would only earn from the test any way so probily would not want that to happen
 
I think a lot of us also forget that many of us are businessmen as well as electricians....Im not advocating unnecessary work but I'm all up for improving the safety of an installation.

I was asked to review anothers EICR recently - they were recommending a CU change when a MCB to RCBO upgrade would have the same outcome ...... with respect to the report - sure the new CU would catch other C3's - so the landlord had the choice !
 
I feel its aC3 improvement recommended ,I think that your boss has misinterpreted what the NICEIC have said RCD protection may well be required for BS7671 17th Amd. 3 but was not prior to this. I can not see the council giving your boss a blank cheque .Is there ant other circuits in the bathroom ?.
 
What sort of electrical 'work' is being carried out in the bathroom?

I only ask, as done some for a local council, where the occupier has disability and the bath is being ripped out and replaced with walk in shower (electric). The council provide a spec, which extends to removing existing circuits, installing new with either new small CU or installing new RCBO's, with new circuits, e.g. lighting & shower radial. Supplementary bonding if required.

The whole thing is done, as new install not altering or adding to original. Less cost to the council, without managing the existing install, and some were bad.
 

Reply to Settle a small disagreement with me and another sparky in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net

News and Offers from Sponsors

  • Article
Join us at electronica 2024 in Munich! Since 1964, electronica has been the premier event for technology enthusiasts and industry professionals...
    • Like
Replies
0
Views
270
  • Sticky
  • Article
Good to know thanks, one can never have enough places to source parts from!
Replies
4
Views
766
  • Article
OFFICIAL SPONSORS These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then...
Replies
0
Views
771

Similar threads

Thanks for the reply littlespark. Yes the works have been carried out. Surely it is fraudulent because basically the document is Not...
Replies
2
Views
707
  • Question
If they got a shock then something cannot have been isolated.
Replies
7
Views
1K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top