almost all jobs ive done in conduit, weve used distance saddles. saves you having to set your tube into gear
In my 25 years of sparking, I have never done an install that relied on the conduit as an earth.
The old "hospital saddle" great stuff
Was that a specification from another authority or regulatory body ?
i would've assumed most new work in steel is done with separate cpc's these days-it's considered good practice anyhow
same with SWA sub-mains -all 5-core probably these days
don't work in the UK but that's the way all jobs i work on are done
steel gives you great reading's and takes most of fault current anyway(about 90% with separate cpc)-but still
I did know Dave that some authorities did ask for seperate CPC's, espicially in corrosive atomspheres. I remember many years ago working in the goldstone factory and in certain areas there they insisted on class 4 conduit but seperate CPC run within the conduit.
But the BS 7671-2008 still recognises the use of conduit as a CPC and to be honest, unless it was a particular design like above I would still use it as a CPC.
Though i agree with you in the use of a separate CPCs in conduits, conduit installed correctly and professionally can and will give you a very good earth return. This was always proved by testing with a 25A ductor test. One of the last projects i was involved in, in the UK was a large shopping centre that totally relied on the steel conduit, throughout the whole building. Never saw a bad reading on any of the final tests i witnessed!!!
What year was that Grandad?
Reply to the thread, titled "Show us your Conduit!" which is posted in Electrician Talk | All Countries on Electricians Forums.