Solution to 2391 Q26 (june 10 paper) | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss Solution to 2391 Q26 (june 10 paper) in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net

G

GStueyXR

here is my solution... and a definitive one too :)

cable is 80m @ 1.87 mΩ....
Resistance of line conductor= (80 x 1.87) / 1000 =0.15 Ω

Load is 45A. Expressed as a resistance 230/45 = 5.1 Ω

Resistance of Neutral conductor= (80 x 1.87) / 1000 =0.15 Ω

Total circuit resistance of 5.4 Ω


42.6A would flow in this circuit

So we have 3 resistors in parralel.

--------| 0.15Ω |-----| 5.1 Ω |-----| 0.15Ω|-------


Vdrop across Line conductor would be ----- 0.15 x 42.6 = 6.4V

Vdrop across load would be ------------------- 5.1 x 42.6 = 217.2V

Vdrop across neutral conductor would be --- 0.15 x 42.6 = 6.4V


So, Vrop in circuit conductors would be - 12.8 V
 
Would you agree with these calcs ???? If so, I got it wrong on the night... I got 13.5 Vdrop....

Dont know how I got this wrong... It is afterall very basic stuff
 
here is my solution... and a definitive one too :)

cable is 80m @ 1.87 mΩ....
Resistance of line conductor= (80 x 1.87) / 1000 =0.15 Ω

Load is 45A. Expressed as a resistance 230/45 = 5.1 Ω

Resistance of Neutral conductor= (80 x 1.87) / 1000 =0.15 Ω

Total circuit resistance of 5.4 Ω


42.6A would flow in this circuit

So we have 3 resistors in parralel.

--------| 0.15Ω |-----| 5.1 Ω |-----| 0.15Ω|-------


Vdrop across Line conductor would be ----- 0.15 x 42.6 = 6.4V

Vdrop across load would be ------------------- 5.1 x 42.6 = 217.2V

Vdrop across neutral conductor would be --- 0.15 x 42.6 = 6.4V


So, Vrop in circuit conductors would be - 12.8 V

depends very much on the wording of the actual question - what is the value 1.87m ohms? is it a an (R1+Rn)/metre for a twin core cable or for just a single core cable. Usually it is for a twin core cable in which case it is just

Vd = Ib x L x m ohms/m
1000

= 45 x 80 x 1.87
1000

= 6.73V
and you don't worry about the neutral.
Also as Lenny said if temperature is mentioned it could just be that there are correction factors to applied to the resistance value
 
Last edited by a moderator:
and you don't worry about the neutral.


Wrong in my opinion.

If there was no PD in the neutral, then current cannot flow. since current is eqaul at all point in a circuit there must be a potential between the termination at load, and the center of the supply transformer.

Every circuit is basically 3 resistors in series.... The line conductor resistance, the load, and the neutral conductor resistance.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Wrong in my opinion.

If there was no PD in the neutral, then current cannot flow. since current is eqaul at all point in a circuit there must be a potential between the termination at load, and the center of the supply transformer.

Every circuit is basically 3 resistors in series.... The line conductor resistance, the load, and the neutral conductor resistance.

I think you are thinking about it too deeply.

As i said it all depends on what that 1.87 figure represents - did it say for a single or a twin core cable? If it is the latter then in all likelyhood you forget the neutral.

don't know if you saw my reply to an earlier post of yours but mV/A/m is resistance per metre.
 
I think you are thinking about it too deeply.

As i said it all depends on what that 1.87 figure represents - did it say for a single or a twin core cable? If it is the latter then in all likelyhood you forget the neutral.

don't know if you saw my reply to an earlier post of yours but mV/A/m is resistance per metre.
26
Durig the course of the inspection one of the single phase radial circuits supplying an item of fixed equipment is to be checked for voltage drop compliance. the circuit has the following charicteristics
. load current =45A
. circuit length =80m
. live conductors =10mm

a) using the info in fig 1 1.83 for 10mm determine wether the circuit meets the requirments for voltage drop.
show all calculations
b) state
i) a suitable observation to be recorded on the periodic report. if the voltage drop fails to comply
ii) one action which could be taken to rectify the situation in b)i above
 
cheers:)
I see it says" line conductors" so i would multiply length by 2 to take account of neutral in this case.
yeah mate i only knew how to do it by mv/A/M X IB X L divided by 1000
but as there was no mv table something was niggling at me saying it was something to do with V=I X R
but i proceeded to work out the resistance by M0hm/M X L divided by 1000 ie 1.83 x 2 x 80 divided by 1000
= 292.8 divided by 1000 = 0.2982OHm = 0.3 ohm then from there not sure if i put 0.2982 X 45 =13.419 = 13.5v 0r 0.3 x 45 =13.5v
then went onto mess the next bit as it asked for a observation and i put something like its not acceptable instead of saying volt drop to high to comply with 5% ie 11.5v
and for last bit of question where it asked what you could do i put increase csa of conductor
head had gone completly by then just hope i did enough earlier on
 
Last edited:
here is my solution... and a definitive one too :)

cable is 80m @ 1.87 mΩ....
Resistance of line conductor= (80 x 1.87) / 1000 =0.15 Ω

Load is 45A. Expressed as a resistance 230/45 = 5.1 Ω

Resistance of Neutral conductor= (80 x 1.87) / 1000 =0.15 Ω

Total circuit resistance of 5.4 Ω


42.6A would flow in this circuit

So we have 3 resistors in parralel.

--------| 0.15Ω |-----| 5.1 Ω |-----| 0.15Ω|-------


Vdrop across Line conductor would be ----- 0.15 x 42.6 = 6.4V

Vdrop across load would be ------------------- 5.1 x 42.6 = 217.2V

Vdrop across neutral conductor would be --- 0.15 x 42.6 = 6.4V


So, Vrop in circuit conductors would be - 12.8 V

Formula to use is

2 x L x Ib x R /1000 = VD

2 x 80 x 45 x 1.87 /1000 = 13.464
 
and for last bit of question where it asked what you could do i put increase csa of conductor
head had gone completly by then just hope i did enough earlier on


nothing wrong with that:) other answers could be reduce the run length or reduce the load, but they might not be possible any way so i reckon you chose the best answer.

(England calls now;))


edit : what a waste of time that was, shocking :-(
 
Last edited by a moderator:
here is my solution... and a definitive one too :)

cable is 80m @ 1.87 mΩ....
Resistance of line conductor= (80 x 1.87) / 1000 =0.15 Ω

Load is 45A. Expressed as a resistance 230/45 = 5.1 Ω

Resistance of Neutral conductor= (80 x 1.87) / 1000 =0.15 Ω

Total circuit resistance of 5.4 Ω


42.6A would flow in this circuit

So we have 3 resistors in parralel.

--------| 0.15Ω |-----| 5.1 Ω |-----| 0.15Ω|-------


Vdrop across Line conductor would be ----- 0.15 x 42.6 = 6.4V

Vdrop across load would be ------------------- 5.1 x 42.6 = 217.2V

Vdrop across neutral conductor would be --- 0.15 x 42.6 = 6.4V


So, Vrop in circuit conductors would be - 12.8 V
I did a slightly simpler solution. I took the 45A to mean the current which flows even with the cable length in the circuit, rather than thinking that 45A is the current which would flow if the fixed equipment was connected directly to the supply. The question described the current as part of the 'circuit characteristics' rather than a characteristic of the equipment. I ended up with a voltage drop of 13.464 which failed the max. permitted 11.5V.
I recorded a Code 2 observation i.e. 'Requires Improvement'.
I then suggested the only way to improve it was to replace the cable with a 16mm run. I can't think of any other way to reduce voltage drop. The equipment was fixed so cannot be moved. I suppose you could replace a section of the 10mm cable with 16mm, say 20m from the board to an FSU connected to the remaining 10mm cable, and that might reduce the VD enough so you don't have to replace the whole lot. Someone could work out exactly what this length should be.
 
are you sure resistance of conductor was 1.87 according to fig 1 it was 1.83 as that was the info provided either way i naffed it up i think not sure how i answered dont know if i found resistance first ie m/ohm/M X l
divide 1000 ie 1.83 x 2 x 80 divide 1000 =292.8 divide by 1000 = 0.2928 and i may have rounded up to 0.3 or left it as it was and then x 45 if it was
0.2928 x 45 = 13.176 rounded up to 13.2v
or
0.3x 45 = 13.5 think i did it the first of these and ended up with vd=13.2v
which is not acceptable

all I know my head was mashed by then hope i maage to get a few marks from it even if i did get the answer wrong
 
Well this question was really so fickle in the fact of one letter making the difference Conductor(s).So damn annoying LOL.

In all fairness city and guilds should not make a question like so, that it can be totally misunderstood.Proof of this alone is all the posts on this question on these forums.I felt a lot of questions in section A were poorly stated also.

We being electricians want to get it spot on in everything we do,so a question like this gets all the interpretations possible, which makes this a great forum.

On the whole the chief examiner needs to make comment on this in his wash up on this exams results.(maybe stick there hands up on this one) But it wont happen lol.
 
Hi Guys

Also did the 2391 exam on 10 June has anyone got a copy of the paper, as I think I might have FAILED looking at this post. Would love to get a copy to work through for my resit in October.

Many Thanks
Steve
 
i thought it said that the live conductors for 10mm2 was 1.83 mohms / m value

so it mite go something like this:cool:

2x mohms/m x Ib x L / 1000
2x 1.83 x 45 x 80 / 1000 = 13.1 v
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Reply to Solution to 2391 Q26 (june 10 paper) in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar Threads

F
Not sure that it would be correct to: Connect Line and Neutral together and test to Earth recording the result on the Schedule of Test Results. I...
Replies
5
Views
10K
Deleted member 26818
D
Z
Do you have the city and guilds exam success guide? this will help tidy-up any terminology difficulties!! Think safety, don't waffle and memorise...
Replies
44
Views
16K
F
Replies
1
Views
5K
richy8ball
R
F
Replies
1
Views
5K
richy8ball
R
F
brilliant just what i been looking for
Replies
1
Views
5K
richy8ball
R

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock    No Thanks