Before @Lucien Nunes decided to explain it, I was well on my way to wasting a mad scientists money by building a Really noisy heater that has the added advantage of being unique in its design.
Thanks Lucian
Thanks Lucian
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Discuss Squeezing the last Drop in the Electrical Engineering Chat area at ElectriciansForums.net
Electric motors are not 100% efficient. Having said that, a 100hp motor puts out 100hp+a small amount of energy not consumed in its operation. It is that small amount that I was trying to capture.With fossil fuel energy on its way out, I have been trying to come up with a way to save the energy we now use. Here is what I came up with.
May the rock-throwing begin.
View attachment 102939
comments pro or con welcome
The losses you are trying to capture are lost in the form of heat and sound.Electric motors are not 100% efficient. Having said that, a 100hp motor puts out 100hp+a small amount of energy not consumed in its operation. It is that small amount that I was trying to capture.
Again, if you think it will work, put your money where your mouth is, make it and test it.Electric motors are not 100% efficient. Having said that, a 100hp motor puts out 100hp+a small amount of energy not consumed in its operation. It is that small amount that I was trying to capture.
only if you say soAfter reading this and previous posts you have made, I can only presume you are a flat earther.
You are contradicting yourself. Every action does not have an equal and opposite reaction. There is some loss in every action.Of which, both sound and heat are largely a result of friction (and a tiny bit of arcing). You could feasibly trap some of the heat by some kind of exchanger and feasibly use some of the air pressure from the noise to drive a diaphragm but all you will ultimately do is create yet more losses downstream in processing that kinetic energy. Newton had this figured out centuries ago - Every action has an EQUAL and opposite reaction. So whilst I applaud you for a drive in efficiency I’d suggest spending your time working on lubricants and bearings rather than this?
You are contradicting yourself. Every action does not have an equal and opposite reaction. There is some loss in every action.
There you go there is loss. Now every aspect of science even so called settled science is and should always be challenged. The challenge here is how to efficiently recover those losses while not spending more time/money/energy than it would to just "accept" those losses.There is some loss in every action.
You are contradicting yourself. Every action does not have an equal and opposite reaction. There is some loss in every action.
In the theoretical world, YesRockingit is correct in what he says.
Is it essential that this apparatus be submerged in sea water?View attachment 104020
The numbers are were
Reply to Squeezing the last Drop in the Electrical Engineering Chat area at ElectriciansForums.net