SY, CY None Compliant????

[Jay Sparks]

So, I'm out on site the other day and the apprentice is installing some SY cable for a ring final circuit. Anyway, we got chatting and he mentions that this type of cable does not comply with BS7671! I said, "of course it does, it's part of the AM2 and it is one of the 7 cable types of the new 2357 apprenticeship NVQ! So out of curiosity I had a look. To my suprise, it does state in the BS7671, that this type, along with YY, CY are none compliant!! I know that most of this multi-core cable comes with none standard colour cores etc but does any one know an actual reason why it is none compliant? I am genuinely interested.

Cheers

Jay

 

[Risteard]

It's to VDE standards.

 

[Jay Sparks]

It's to VDE standards.

But why is it in the AM2 and NVQ? Boggles the mind!!

Jay

 

[Risteard]

But why is it in the AM2 and NVQ? Boggles the mind!!

Jay

LOL. Can't answer that. It wasn't in the AM2 when I did it.

Is it being used for controls or what in the AM2?

 

[Jay Sparks]

LOL. Can't answer that. It wasn't in the AM2 when I did it.

Is it being used for controls or what in the AM2?

Yeah the motor and DOL starter. But it is also in the list of 9 cables for the 2357. Strange! I assumed that it was because the conductors were mainly all black and had to be taped/sleeved but then someone mentioned it might because it isn't BASEC compliant (or whatever it is)lol

Jay

 

[Adam W]

I know it's not considered suitable as an "earthed metallic sheath capable of withstanding penetration by a nail or the like" or however the regs word it, but I find it hard to believe it's been 'banned' altogether.

 

[Simonslimline]

Out of interest, why was SY the choice of cable for an RFC?

 

[Darkwood]

SY and CY were been used as an all round armoured cable by thousands of sparks when it isn't suitable, rather than list the uses it is OK for which is few they seem to make life easy to just say no.... seen plenty of live un- earthed braid on this stuff over the yrs ... apparently the Regs are getting so dumbed down to cater for the idiots. ..:sad3:

 

[davesparks]

So, I'm out on site the other day and the apprentice is installing some SY cable for a ring final circuit. Anyway, we got chatting and he mentions that this type of cable does not comply with BS7671! I said, "of course it does, it's part of the AM2 and it is one of the 7 cable types of the new 2357 apprenticeship NVQ! So out of curiosity I had a look. To my suprise, it does state in the BS7671, that this type, along with YY, CY are none compliant!! I know that most of this multi-core cable comes with none standard colour cores etc but does any one know an actual reason why it is none compliant? I am genuinely interested.

Cheers

Jay

I believe it is perfectly acceptable to use it if it is suitable for the job with respect to its specific properties and if those properties are required, which is pretty much the same as any cable.
SY is designed for, and has the properties required for, control circuits and power circuits such as the output of a VFD where good EMC screening is required with some vibration resistance indoors and where a low level of mechanical strength is acceptable.

Off the top of my head one regulation which could be used to prevent its use for general installation work would be the one which requires that flex used in a fixed installation be of the heavy duty type such as H07-RNF.


I know of one installation where I had to remove and replace with SWA some SY installed by someone else following a local authority inspection where they flagged it up. At the same place I also had to remove some FP200 which had been used to extend and MICC circuit and replace it with MICC.

 

[davesparks]

SY and CY were been used as an all round armoured cable by thousands of sparks when it isn't suitable, rather than list the uses it is OK for which is few they seem to make life easy to just say no.... seen plenty of live un- earthed braid on this stuff over the yrs ... apparently the Regs are getting so dumbed down to cater for the idiots. ..:sad3:

It became popular in theatre/events (particularly sound companies) a couple of years ago, and it is thoroughly unsuitable for that job! To the point that it has been specifically written in to BS7909 that SY and blue arctic are not to be used outdoors. And I think IIRC it advises against the use of SY scull stop

 

[Jay Sparks]

Out of interest, why was SY the choice of cable for an RFC?

It's in a garage/body shop and I think the customer had loads of reels spare!!

 

[Andy78]

FWIW I have done a bit of internet research

Basec article on control cable and it's compliance from 2013
BASEC - British Approvals Service for Cables

The above article references regulation 511.1 of BS7671 which states that all equipment shall conform to a current BS or BS EN standard.

Looking at manufacturer's websites, some state that their control cable conforms to BS EN 50525 (or parts of it) which has superseded BS 6500. Some only claim their cables meet VDE standards and no others, and are not to be used in fixed wiring installations designed to comply with BS7671.

I think this industry wide discrepancy, and the dumbing down due to historical improper application of this cable as DW says, are both responsible for the blanket advice to avoid use of this cable.

 

[Jay Sparks]

Make of this what you will!



Only states it "discourages" us from using it. And as Andy has said above, move manufacturers state that their cab;le confirms to SOME parts but not all!

Jay

 

[Andy78]

Make of this what you will!

View attachment 32168

Only states it "discourages" us from using it. And as Andy has said above, move manufacturers state that their cab;le confirms to SOME parts but not all!

Jay

What I meant by that was that BS EN 50525 has sub divisions. Some manufacturers claim compliance with one of these sub divisions, such as BS EN 50525-2-11, which in itself is an entire standard and as such would be compliant to use under BS7671 if following the advice of the manufacturer.

The OSG advice could be deemed as misleading if such BS EN standards are being met in the production of control cable.

 

[SheffSimon]

I believe it is perfectly acceptable to use it if it is suitable for the job with respect to its specific properties and if those properties are required, which is pretty much the same as any cable.
SY is designed for, and has the properties required for, control circuits and power circuits such as the output of a VFD where good EMC screening is required with some vibration resistance indoors and where a low level of mechanical strength is acceptable.

Off the top of my head one regulation which could be used to prevent its use for general installation work would be the one which requires that flex used in a fixed installation be of the heavy duty type such as H07-RNF.


I know of one installation where I had to remove and replace with SWA some SY installed by someone else following a local authority inspection where they flagged it up. At the same place I also had to remove some FP200 which had been used to extend and MICC circuit and replace it with MICC.

Poor EMC screening from SY, the braiding is full of holes, and it's supposed to be a control cable, not a power cable.