testing zs - EAWR | Page 2 | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss testing zs - EAWR in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net

I phoned the DNO once regarding a Ze reading; the scenario in my previous post was what I was told. I told the woman the address and the earthing system (TN-C-S) and received the quote of 0.2 ohms. I then said "no, sorry, its TN-S" and she revised the figure to 0.8 ohms!

It appears that the DNO round my way has done lots of tests and all TN-S installations are 0.8 ohms and all TN-C-S are 0.2 ohms.

My tester read 0.2 ohms, I seem to remember, for this TN-S installation, but what do I know!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Although its possible to calculate many of the values we use and require,in a lot of instances,this is better done to back up the actual measured results.Given the importance of these,it is always beneficial to have actual values to assist the accuracy of further investigation of problems which avoids calculating using calculated figures.Safety issues whilst doing this IS PART OF THE JOB. Isnt that pause, whilst your MFT makes its mind up, why we do this job? Anyway,didnt they "calculate" that 45 minutes thing which lead to Iraq?.....should have dropped that bonding and put their probes on Bagdad.............
 
As far as I'm concerned mate, it couldn't be simpler. I do a live Zs on socket and cooker circuits simply because I can plug the test lead directly into the socket outlets without opening the enclosure. Lights and water heaters etc I do dead and by calculation simply because it is illegal to work on or near live conductors (EWR1989 regulation 14). I know on the NICEIC schedules it asks for a measured value but I would argue this point with anyone from the NIC. The law is the law and it is simply wrong to encourage anyone to break the law. Its black and white for me, they get calculated values and thats that!
 
That may also suggest the ZS has been calculated from Zs = Ze + (R1 + R2) which is what I do on any circuit that I can't plug in to
I've seen aa couple of EICR's recently where the Ze + (R1+R2) is exactly the same as the Zs which suggests that the R1+R2 hasn't been dead tested at all.
 
As far as I'm concerned mate, it couldn't be simpler. I do a live Zs on socket and cooker circuits simply because I can plug the test lead directly into the socket outlets without opening the enclosure. Lights and water heaters etc I do dead and by calculation simply because it is illegal to work on or near live conductors (EWR1989 regulation 14). I know on the NICEIC schedules it asks for a measured value but I would argue this point with anyone from the NIC. The law is the law and it is simply wrong to encourage anyone to break the law. Its black and white for me, they get calculated values and thats that!

With a make believe Ze value via telephone ?
 
As far as I'm concerned mate, it couldn't be simpler. I do a live Zs on socket and cooker circuits simply because I can plug the test lead directly into the socket outlets without opening the enclosure. Lights and water heaters etc I do dead and by calculation simply because it is illegal to work on or near live conductors (EWR1989 regulation 14). I know on the NICEIC schedules it asks for a measured value but I would argue this point with anyone from the NIC. The law is the law and it is simply wrong to encourage anyone to break the law. Its black and white for me, they get calculated values and thats that!

so, by that reckoning, a scuba diver shouldn't work in water, he might drown, a pilot should fly his plane just on the runway in case it falls from the sky, a miner should only pick up coal if it's lying on top of the ground in case he gets buried, a gas fitter should calculate his pressure and leaks with the gas supply turned off, in case he gasses himself. .

lts take it further. why bother to use MFTs to measure R1+R2? might set it to 1000V IR by mistake and get zapped. let's measure the cable length with a tape measure, then use tables to calculate the resistance. OH NO, H&S have banned tape measures, sharp edges can cut your head off.
 
I really can't see a problem with live testing.
My tester has insulated probes and croc clips and they fit nicely into the terminals of contactors/wall isolators/d.boards and the like.
I take live Zs readings as remote on all circuits as is humanly possible.......normally at the incoming terminals of the machine isolator ( no different to testing in domestic scenarios only these are 3 phase).
If my probes will fit then it gets tested live..........parallel paths the lot:)
 
All this 'illegal' crap is a literal interpretation on 'Live Working' it's Live testing not live working, to the OP Jimmy one ball, how the hell do you function as a spark ? Do you never take a cover off a CU ? even with the MS off your working ' Illegally' according to your logic, unless every job your on has a DP isolator at the CU.. well you can't be pulling the DNO fuse because that's live working ? to me 'Live working' is the removal, installation or manipulation of Live conductors whilst the installation is energised, I am doing nine of these.I'M TESTING FOR GODS SAKE do you never do a Live Ze ? a Live PEFC/PSSC ? your a professional, trained competent, you have all the BS compliant testing equipment..the risk is so infinitesimally small why even drive to work you may get killed getting there..aaaggghhh
 

Reply to testing zs - EAWR in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net

News and Offers from Sponsors

  • Article
Join us at electronica 2024 in Munich! Since 1964, electronica has been the premier event for technology enthusiasts and industry professionals...
    • Like
Replies
0
Views
319
  • Sticky
  • Article
Good to know thanks, one can never have enough places to source parts from!
Replies
4
Views
846
  • Article
OFFICIAL SPONSORS These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then...
Replies
0
Views
968

Similar threads

I have a question i hope someone can just give me a little clarification on . When carrying out preliminary cable design for a given circuit we...
Replies
0
Views
255
Interesting question & always gonna get different views on this. EICR testing seems to have changed over the years & not by us the Electricians...
Replies
7
Views
1K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top