Corr.....wouldn't hurt to expand on that with some actual constructive comments.
You take it I am unable to read? Haha.....what a comment. What are you, a child? Nice one
Reasons for my comments should be self explanitory. Across both this and two other threads, there has been a great deal of reasoned and intelligent debate as to the efficacy of this product. There are those such as Gavin A who think there may be some mileage in them and others such as myself who have seen no evidence and are still awaiting requested and not forthcoming performance data for colder climates (or any climate).
Successful installation does not mean they will perform to a level that produces renewable energy as now defined. Successful installation may mean it hasn't fallen off the wall. There is no available data as to the product's CO2 mitigation or whether in on-grid areas they are any better than gas.
If you had bothered to read the threads in detail and taken in all the useful contributions made, I cannot see how you would have made the comments you did. No responsible business would push a product for which they cannot give an accurate indication of performance. My insurers would certainly consider it reckless behavior with all the implications that carries.
It would seem that Ofgem/MCS agree with this hence the reason they have issued the follow up letter yesterday.
The one thing everyone wants is real life performance data for this type of heat pump to compare it with those already on the market and also with solar thermal. Not a big ask, but I am deafened by the silence of the response from several different suppliers.
As Gavin A has rightly pointed out, the provenance and methods of those selling the product has cast further doubt on the technology. If it is really so good, in my opinion it wouldn't need to be pushed at all as it would sell itself.