TN-C-S System Max Zs for Final Circuit Protected By 30mA Type B 16A RCBO | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss TN-C-S System Max Zs for Final Circuit Protected By 30mA Type B 16A RCBO in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Joined
Dec 3, 2024
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Location
Europe
TN-C-S System Max Zs for Final Circuit Protected By 30mA Type B 16A RCBO

I have read a few articles stating that under BS7671, max permissible Zs earth loop impedance for above circuit is 1667 Ohms.

1667 ohm permissible Zs for above circuit protected by 30mA RCD would only seem to satisfy BS7671 clause 411.4.4 in regards to fault current. There is also a requirement to provide overcurrent protection i.e. MCB/RCBO. Table 41.3 details max Zs for the overcurrent characteristics of RCBO which is 1.37 Ohms for Type B 16A RCBO. A 1667 ohm Zs would seem to be non-compliant in regards to overcurrent characteristics of RCBO detailed in Table 41.3

Granted at best, Zs can only infer the impedance of line/neutral for overcurrent short circuit scenario . But never the less, this is the requirement of Table 41.3 for the overcurrent characteristics of an RCBO.

Interested in your thoughts on this.
 
If you have protection against shock sorted by the rcd component, why are you concerned about over current when it will be sorted by the Mcb part of the device and cares nothing about the earth loop.
 
If you have protection against shock sorted by the rcd component, why are you concerned about over current when it will be sorted by the Mcb part of the device and cares nothing about the earth loop.
I am concerned with BS7671 non-compliance.

In a scenario where we have an overcurrent short circuit between line/neutral, it is my understanding that the RCD integrated into the RCBO will not detect the short circuit and will not disconnect. The MCB integrated into the RCBO should detect the overcurrent short circuit and disconnect. However if the line/neutral impedance is excessively high, for example 1667 Ohms, then it will take a longer time before it will disconnect. I would think this could lead to serious issues.

I am curious to know why people do not adhere to Table 41.3 max Zs for the overcurrent characteristics of an RCBO.
 
Your line/neutral will not be that high.

Agreed, it is very unlikely.

Line/Neutral impedance needs to be much lower to ensure that the RCBO can provide effective overcurrent protection. Perhaps a suitable Line/Neutral impedance would be something similar to the Zs values detailed for overcurrent characteristics of RCBO in Table 41.3
 
The protective device will not differentiate between a line/earth fault and a line/neutral fault it just reacts to excessive current regardless of how it is derived.
 
You are confusing the need to meet ADS (Zs value) with the need to calculate using the Adiabatic equation for overcurrent (granted only really of value at disconnect less than 5 seconds and ideally <0.1 seconds).

Consider thermal effects. The RCD does not provide protection against the impacts of overcurrent because it is not an overcurrent protective device. Overcurrent impacts include the thermal effects as a result of fault current or overload current. It is not only shock that needs to be considered.
The RCD as the name refers is for residual current.

There are no energy let through values for rcd's because the standards work on the basis that the rcd will be backed up with an overcurrent protective device. Even with RCBO's the values for let through and make / break relate to the mcb aspect of the device.
In your example, a TN-C-S with Zs of 1667 ohms, well we can stop at that point because at those values you would have a serious issue regardless and that needs sorting out. You would never design a circuit on those values, how could you even do so... But lets go with someone did and the values improved at some future point now what ?
 
However if the line/neutral impedance is excessively high, for example 1667 Ohms, then it will take a longer time before it will disconnect. I would think this could lead to serious issues.
How long do you think it would take for your 16 A rcbo to disconnect using the figures in your example and what would be your concern?
 
You are confusing the need to meet ADS (Zs value) with the need to calculate using the Adiabatic equation for overcurrent (granted only really of value at disconnect less than 5 seconds and ideally <0.1 seconds).

Consider thermal effects. The RCD does not provide protection against the impacts of overcurrent because it is not an overcurrent protective device. Overcurrent impacts include the thermal effects as a result of fault current or overload current. It is not only shock that needs to be considered.
The RCD as the name refers is for residual current.

There are no energy let through values for rcd's because the standards work on the basis that the rcd will be backed up with an overcurrent protective device. Even with RCBO's the values for let through and make / break relate to the mcb aspect of the device.
In your example, a TN-C-S with Zs of 1667 ohms, well we can stop at that point because at those values you would have a serious issue regardless and that needs sorting out. You would never design a circuit on those values, how could you even do so... But lets go with someone did and the values improved at some future point now what ?

Yes, I am aware that an RCD does not provide overcurrent protection, as I have stated in my original post above an MCB/RCBO has to be provided for overcurrent protection.

Agreed, a consultant should avoid producing a design that has very high impedances.

My post concerns BS7671 Max permissible Zs for Final Circuit Protected By 30mA Type B 16A RCBO on a TN-C-S System.

Max permissible Zs for above circuit is ?
 
Yes, I am aware that an RCD does not provide overcurrent protection, as I have stated in my original post above an MCB/RCBO has to be provided for overcurrent protection.

Agreed, a consultant should avoid producing a design that has very high impedances.

My post concerns BS7671 Max permissible Zs for Final Circuit Protected By 30mA Type B 16A RCBO on a TN-C-S System.

Max permissible Zs for above circuit is ?
How have you designed the circuit? Is the 30mA RCD for Additional Protection? What is the Volt Drop?
 
Table 41.3 details max Zs for the overcurrent characteristics of RCBO which is 1.37 Ohms
Table 41.3 details max Zs times as specified (not typing it all out) .
If you are looking at overcurrent there is more to be considered. 1.37 ohms is not the requirement to be met for selection of suitable overcurrent protection between live conductors.

Even with Zs values that are high (relative) on a TT system for fault current and cpc sizing the worst case must be considered and that can be many times higher than that calculated by the RA value.
 
The protective device will not differentiate between a line/earth fault and a line/neutral fault it just reacts to excessive current regardless of how it is derived.

In regards to my original post, it's not quite that simple.

For the circuit described in my original post, the RCBO will typically disconnect in a shorter time duration for line/earth (fault current) due to the RCD integrated into the RCBO. As the RCD only requires a relatively small amount of current to trip this leads to a higher permissible Zs for BS7671 Clause 411.4.4.

When determining max permissible Zs for circuit in my original post, I am also considering Table 41.3 for the overcurrent characteristics of an RCBO.

There is a distinct difference between line/earth fault current and a line/neutral overcurrent that needs to be considered in the context of my original post.
 

Reply to TN-C-S System Max Zs for Final Circuit Protected By 30mA Type B 16A RCBO in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

News and Offers from Sponsors

  • Article
Join us at electronica 2024 in Munich! Since 1964, electronica has been the premier event for technology enthusiasts and industry professionals...
    • Like
Replies
0
Views
526
  • Sticky
  • Article
Good to know thanks, one can never have enough places to source parts from!
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Article
OFFICIAL SPONSORS These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then...
Replies
0
Views
2K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top