Tools for detecting hazardous electricity

[Veeeee]

DIY
I want to detect for ‘loose’ or ‘hazardous’ electricity in the floor/walls/ceiling of my home.
I get a vibrating electrical sensation in my body when I sleep and I think it might be related to an old fridge perhaps or some loose wire somewhere in the room.

Any advice on which devices I can buy to detect this please?

Many thanks
Vee

 

[littlespark]

First rule out the obvious.

And is it an electrical “feeling” or just an irritating buzzing noise?

Anything that has built in circuitry can cause a buzz or a hum. The fixed wiring within walls is generally not doing anything until you plug something in.

So check for noise from fluorescent or LED lights, fridges, freezers, TVs and other electronic equipment. Etc.
Completely unplug one thing each night to narrow down what it could be.

 

[Veeeee]

First rule out the obvious.

And is it an electrical “feeling” or just an irritating buzzing noise?

Anything that has built in circuitry can cause a buzz or a hum. The fixed wiring within walls is generally not doing anything until you plug something in.

So check for noise from fluorescent or LED lights, fridges, freezers, TVs and other electronic equipment. Etc.
Completely unplug one thing each night to narrow down what it could be.

Its not a noise, its a low vibrating and oscillating sensation of a current passing through my body.

 

[MJPD29]

Its not a noise, its a low vibrating and oscillating sensation of a current passing through my body.

You should probably contact your doctor

 

[Pauls0212]

i wondered who would be first.... well done Matthew

 

[Veeeee]

You should probably contact your doctor

Would a voltage detection meter be able to pick up on current in floors or walls?

Are touch meters more reliable than no touch meters please?

 

[James]

I think the first place to start would be to get an electrician round to do a EICR
this is an electrical safety report that will flag up any safety issues.

 

[SparkyChick]

As James has said, find a reputable electrician (we can help there) and have them inspect and test the electrical installation of your home, paying particular attention to the room in which you sleep and any electrical appliances/devices in that room.

 

[MJPD29]

Would a voltage detection meter be able to pick up on current in floors or walls?

Are touch meters more reliable than no touch meters please?

Touch meters are extremely unreliable and will pick up static from your body. They are a waste of time

 

[Mike Johnson]

Are we going to go back to "sleeping on an earth mat", I remember a very long thread on that subject.

 

[MJPD29]

Are we going to go back to "sleeping on an earth mat", I remember a very long thread on that subject.

It's the only way to sleep

 

[Veeeee]

Touch meters are extremely unreliable and will pick up static from your body. They are a waste of time

So no touch meters are best
EG
Something like this:

C.K AC Non-Contact Mains Voltage Tester 1000V AC - Screwfix

Order online at Screwfix.com. High sensitivity tester, offering an extensive non-contact voltage detection range of 70-1000V AC. Suitable for non-contact AC voltage tests, earthing / ground connection checks, proper connection checks and broken wire detection. Double-insulated to ensure safe use...

www.screwfix.com

?

 

[Mike Johnson]

Touch voltage testers will tell you there is some voltage somewhere, just not very reliable telling you where, some are far better than others.

 

[brianmoooore]

Touch meters are extremely unreliable ...... They are a waste of time

Don't agree with that conclusion at all. They are far from a waste of time, but you do have to know how and what they detect and interpret it correctly - like the time I found that one indicated I had a 'live' earth wire. FI indicated that the earth was as it should be, and it was the floor I was standing on, me, and the surrounding concrete walls that were 'live' because of a faulty cable in the wall.

 

[nicebutdim]

I suspect the post in question should have read 'non contact' or 'non touch' and the omission was erroneous.