View the thread, titled "Twin and Earth American style" which is posted in USA Electrical Forum on Electricians Forums.

Can anyone tell me more about Twin and Earth American style?

SUPPU.jpg

What's it's full name? NM?
Is it always flat?
Do you add a sheath to the ground/earth cable?
Thanks 😊
 
Unlikely to be silk, which was only used for very fine coil winding wires due to cost. Before PVC, the normal insulation for British conduit cables was VIR, vulcanised rubber covered with an impregnated cotton braid. The rubber provided the insulation, the cotton provided the strength and abrasion resistance, and the impregnation protected it against rot. Other woven coverings for power cables included polybutyl jute and cambric.
 
That's ordinary VIR conduit cable, I can't see the conductor to say what size it is. Rubber extruded over the conductor (sometimes in two layers) and the braided cotton serving over the top. There's thousands of miles of this stuff still in use, decreasing rapidly now but not all gone yet. The same is true of the nearest USA equivalent. They used a version with a heavier cotton braid but basically the same concept.

When the rubber-insulated cores were used inside a rubber or lead sheath, instead of the woven cotton braid they were usually lapped in cotton tape.
 
Can anyone tell me more about Twin and Earth American style?

View attachment 107858
What's it's full name? NM?
Is it always flat?
Do you add a sheath to the ground/earth cable?
Thanks 😊
NM or Romex is flat for 14/2, 12/2, or 10/2 or 3 conductor. Starting at # 8 or # 6 is normally round. I still can’t understand why we have naked grounds but it’s easy to purchase shrink tubing that can be installed on the naked wire. Be sure and mark it green.
 
Thanks for the info.
NM or Romex is flat for 14/2, 12/2, or 10/2 or 3 conductor. Starting at # 8 or # 6 is normally round. I still can’t understand why we have naked grounds but it’s easy to purchase shrink tubing that can be installed on the naked wire. Be sure and mark it green.
Thanks, I assume it's naked like us for cost? but also the Earth/Ground is normally of a smaller size/diameter than the Live and Neutral.

But I would be interested in there is some other thinking behind the ground being bare. I mean I have known people in the UK say it's for safety incase a nail is driven into the cable.
 
Thanks for the info.

Thanks, I assume it's naked like us for cost? but also the Earth/Ground is normally of a smaller size/diameter than the Live and Neutral.

But I would be interested in there is some other thinking behind the ground being bare. I mean I have known people in the UK say it's for safety incase a nail is driven into the cable.
The ground is the same size as the conductors because you can’t derate the ground until you reach 40 amps or more.
 
Thanks, I assume it's naked like us for cost? but also the Earth/Ground is normally of a smaller size/diameter than the Live and Neutral.
The ground size depends on the adiabatic limit and for that the USA has had less demanding specs than the UK for some time, so as @Megawatt says reduced CPC size is only for quite big cables. Similar to the EU in that respect.

The UK has long favoured fuses as OCPD and they are very good at limiting the I2t let-through, also our design requierments on Zs to guarantee the disconnection time also is a factor in keeping I2t down due to the short 't' value and they are rather more onerous than EU/USA.
But I would be interested in there is some other thinking behind the ground being bare. I mean I have known people in the UK say it's for safety incase a nail is driven into the cable.
I think it is partly cost (not just the PVC needed, but the resulting size and weight for shipping), and partly to make the cable smaller so easier to work with.

If you nail a cable it is pot-luck as to what you hit anyway. I think the bigger safety aspect is the E/CPC between the live conductors so less likely to get L-N fault and so more chance of RCD picking up damage due to rodent chewing, etc. But that is more speculation.
 
I mean it is kind of worksite speculation but there is a little bit of truth that it adds safety. If the Live or Neutral insulation are damaged they automatically come into contact with the bare CPC. Metal enclosures are kind of automatically earthed.

But I agree and have always been taught it's because of cost.
 
I mean it is kind of worksite speculation but there is a little bit of truth that it adds safety. If the Live or Neutral insulation are damaged they automatically come into contact with the bare CPC. Metal enclosures are kind of automatically earthed.

But I agree and have always been taught it's because of cost.
This kind of speculation has led some people to believe that it's a requirement for all cables to contain a CPC. (Even on this forum!)
As you say, the only real design advantage is the reduced cost.
 

Reply to the thread, titled "Twin and Earth American style" which is posted in USA Electrical Forum on Electricians Forums.

Best EV Chargers by Electrical2Go! The official electric vehicle charger supplier.

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

Daily, weekly or monthly email

USA Electrical Advice

Welcome to the USA Electrical Forum at ElectriciansForums.net. The friendliest electrical forum online. General electrical questions and answers can be found in the electrical forum.

UK Electrical Forum

This is the main UK Electrical Forum at ElectriciansForums.net. Electrician Laws and Regulations related to Electrics and Electricals within the United Kingdom. Electrician talk, questions and answers can be found in our UK electrical forum.
Back
Top