Ukip

[Guest77]

I take those are two separate, completely unrelated things

Coupled with wanting that war criminal filth blair back I can only assume this is a humour thread

:lol:

What qualifies you to suggest he is a war criminal? evidence please Numpty.

 

[telectrix]

that is one thing i can't blame blair for. the decision to go to war against saddam was taken by parliament after advice from the ( holy cow, got to preserve our index linked pensions) civil service

 

[Guest77]

By voting for the party you're telling everyone to vote for?

Look at Miliband - how can you expect him to manage the affairs of the country when he can't even manage a bacon sandwich?
He looks so silly trying to eat that sandwich.

View attachment 28790

So what? what a totally ridiculous post Adam, I am aware your a raving tory, but even that comment is lower than the most right wing back bencher would even mention, why does struggling to eat a bacon sandwich stop him running the country?

 

[rapparee]

 

[trev]

He looks so silly trying to eat that sandwich.

View attachment 28790

If that's anyone's idea of a valid political argument then they're not clever enough to hold one. This has been turned into something by the idiotic tabloid press who, incidentally, make no mention of how stupid Cameron looked eating something last week or the week before.
Utter bull**** just like the current arguments put forward by the parties themselves, "Don't vote for them because they'll do X"
What about "Vote for us because we will do Y"

 

[Guest77]

Northerners almost the same as people, say Tories

 

[Octopus]

the tories stick him on tv when it suits them, they own all the TV Stations, your brain washed just like the other tory voters here, have a mind of your own and try thinking for yourself.

As usual, absolute crap trap from Ed Millibands No 1 fan

 

[Octopus]

Vote labour, the party who cares about nothing except themselves.

..........

 

[Adam W]

So what? what a totally ridiculous post Adam, I am aware your a raving tory, but even that comment is lower than the most right wing back bencher would even mention, why does struggling to eat a bacon sandwich stop him running the country?

It's not much different to any of your absurd claims, which you seem unable to back up with evidence - "the tories want to do this that and the other, Labour care about the poor" etc. At least with my post you can see that Miliband looks silly eating a bacon sandwich, which incidentally he seems to be trying to use to his advantage, trying to swerve serious questions with answers like "well I'm not going to win any competitions for eating bacon sandwiches".

 

[Adam W]

If that's anyone's idea of a valid political argument then they're not clever enough to hold one.

See my previous post - Miliband is trying to use the sandwich incident to his advantage; never mind trying to hold a political argument he's actually expecting people to vote for him to run the country.

Utter bull**** just like the current arguments put forward by the parties themselves, "Don't vote for them because they'll do X"

Privatise the NHS?

What about "Vote for us because we will do Y"

Reduce the deficit?

 

[derek]

Link didn't work

 

[trev]

Well when a company with a tory minister on their board of directors wins an NHS contract despite bidding £7 million more than the NHS organisation themselves what do you expect people to think?
Reduce the deficit? That's a laugh. They've borrowed more in 5 years than Labour did in 13. The deficit is not being reduced by this cokehead chancellor.

 

[Adam W]

I am aware you're a raving tory,

Not at all - I might vote UKIP. One party I won't be voting for though is Labour.

 

[trev]

Tory or UKIP, it's the same bloody thing. Except the tories aren't tory enough for some.

 

[Adam W]

Well when a company with a tory minister on their board of directors wins an NHS contract despite bidding £7 million more than the NHS organisation themselves what do you expect people to think?
Reduce the deficit? That's a laugh. They've borrowed more in 5 years than Labour did in 13. The deficit is not being reduced by this cokehead chancellor.

And what's Labour's plan to reduce the deficit they created? They seem to have loads of ideas about frivolous ways to waste money, but they can't seem to come up with any viable plans to pay for it all. Tax the rich? They tried that in the 70s and it didn't work then, yet they'd have us believe they learned from their past mistakes.