Upgrading a CU on a domestic property requirements | Page 2 | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss Upgrading a CU on a domestic property requirements in the Domestic Electrician Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Joined
Jun 8, 2020
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Location
London
Hi all, I wonder if you can help me out please.

I have been approached by family friend to upgrade their CU in a home they are looking to sell. I am a registered Electrician, but do not hold my Part P qualification as the heavy majority of my work is done on Commercial works.

I am fully capable of doing the work, but am uncertain whether I am permitted to do the work without Part P, and I don’t know whether I need to have this signed off by anyone/an authority?

If anyone could help me out here, that would be great. Thanks

TM
 
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A "PART P" ELECTRICIAN
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS "PART P" QUALIFICATIONS

There is notification of notifiable works according to the Building Regulations, and the exemptions to prior notification fi the work is done by a member of an approved scam... err I mean scheme. It's unfortunate that Part P (which is only one paragraph and basically says that works must be safe) was introduced at the same time (2005 BRs) as notification requirements were extended to some electrical works.

IMO there is little point asking the LABC dept about something as simple as that - it gives them the opportunity to say no and have little chance of having to justify it. So they'll take the easy route and just say no to anything that doesn't fit their narrative. LABCs are also well known for making up their own requirements (like needing an extractor fan in a room that's got an opening window).
If presented with a professional looking certificate for the works (especially assuming the person has appropriate trade insurance), then they should accept that.

I did ask LABC at my last house. I was doing some minor building works so got them to give their advice up front, and to be fair, they were very helpful - even told me what size concrete lintel to use that would make them happy. A friend has been doing some major works over the last couple of years, and he's found them very helpful as well. As for the CU replacement I had planned, he asked if I'd be getting someone to test it - I replied that I'd provide a set of test results and he seemed to be happy with that.
The key thing is that if provided with reasonable looking paperwork then their back is covered. Present them with no certificates, os some scrawl on the back of a smoke packet and they are going to be "sceptical".

For a board change, just do the work and issue a professional looking EIC. The homeowner is responsible for prior notification to LABC, and paying the fees. Technically, the "lying when filling in the TA6 form" can be got around by ticking the box for "yes, there have been electrical works since 2005", adding a note that no there are no LABC completion certificates - but here's the EIC. There's still the issue of not complying with BRs, that's time limited anyway (is it 4 years after which the LA can't do anything ?) if the householder isn't planning on selling soon.

As an aside, my LA (South Lakeland) charges ÂŁ180 fees for a CU change.
 
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A "PART P" ELECTRICIAN
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS "PART P" QUALIFICATIONS

There is notification of notifiable works according to the Building Regulations, and the exemptions to prior notification fi the work is done by a member of an approved scam... err I mean scheme. It's unfortunate that Part P (which is only one paragraph and basically says that works must be safe) was introduced at the same time (2005 BRs) as notification requirements were extended to some electrical works.

IMO there is little point asking the LABC dept about something as simple as that - it gives them the opportunity to say no and have little chance of having to justify it. So they'll take the easy route and just say no to anything that doesn't fit their narrative. LABCs are also well known for making up their own requirements (like needing an extractor fan in a room that's got an opening window).
If presented with a professional looking certificate for the works (especially assuming the person has appropriate trade insurance), then they should accept that.

I did ask LABC at my last house. I was doing some minor building works so got them to give their advice up front, and to be fair, they were very helpful - even told me what size concrete lintel to use that would make them happy. A friend has been doing some major works over the last couple of years, and he's found them very helpful as well. As for the CU replacement I had planned, he asked if I'd be getting someone to test it - I replied that I'd provide a set of test results and he seemed to be happy with that.
The key thing is that if provided with reasonable looking paperwork then their back is covered. Present them with no certificates, os some scrawl on the back of a smoke packet and they are going to be "sceptical".

For a board change, just do the work and issue a professional looking EIC. The homeowner is responsible for prior notification to LABC, and paying the fees. Technically, the "lying when filling in the TA6 form" can be got around by ticking the box for "yes, there have been electrical works since 2005", adding a note that no there are no LABC completion certificates - but here's the EIC. There's still the issue of not complying with BRs, that's time limited anyway (is it 4 years after which the LA can't do anything ?) if the householder isn't planning on selling soon.

As an aside, my LA (South Lakeland) charges ÂŁ180 fees for a CU change.
I use the term "Part P electrician" to describe a registered competent person, as this is what you need to be to self certify, and what most people will understand and connect with.
The official qualification is:
City & Guilds Level 3 Certificate in the Building Regulations for Electrical Installations in Dwellings (2393-10). It's easier just to say Part P qualified...
Sorry to make you SHOUT! ?

And just for the record, I detest the whole part p fiasco and have done from the start in 2005, but as most of my work is domestic, I find, sadly, that being self certified is the only way for me to continue working in this field.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Reply to Upgrading a CU on a domestic property requirements in the Domestic Electrician Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

News and Offers from Sponsors

  • Article
Join us at electronica 2024 in Munich! Since 1964, electronica has been the premier event for technology enthusiasts and industry professionals...
    • Like
Replies
0
Views
259
  • Sticky
  • Article
Good to know thanks, one can never have enough places to source parts from!
Replies
4
Views
744
  • Article
OFFICIAL SPONSORS These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then...
Replies
0
Views
738

Similar threads

  • Question
Isn't it just a little sad that it should cost sooooooo much to LOG a few jobs to BC.... O where did it all go very wrong ? Signed Man in tights...
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Question
By retired electrician, I mean that I have retained my ticket but no longer do installation work. Thanks for the clarification. I missed that it...
Replies
2
Views
478

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top