OP
Smudge
I'm not siding with the claims, or 100% against them, just looking for a decent debate on it. Their gaurantee was if the target saving was not met, then they would give us the cash difference on the FIRST year. There would have to be a lot more room for negotiation on that for starters.
playing devils advocate here...but here is an extract from the reply email i just got.
Hi Martin,
I have included some info on motors and a couple of other pdf’s that you may find interesting.
3phase is no different than single phase ... the principles are exactly the same.
For motors the key points are as follows
· We take the motor to the voltage at which it was designed to operate
· Lightly loaded motors can off significant savings
· VSD driven motors can still yield significant savings ... especially if the inverter frequency is >45Hz and the motor itself is lightly loaded
· The speed of a motor is NOT compromised AS LONG AS the voltage is not taken below it’s designed level
· Torque is not reduced ...
· IF a motor was taken to way below its designed operating voltage e.g. 209V ... then slip could increase significantly = reduced speed.
· Reducing losses in a motor should in no way be confused with the task the motor has to perform. E.g. an 11kW motor running DOL, supplied at 415Vand driving a pump to move water from A to B might reasonably consume 7kW. Reducing the voltage to the motor to 380V might reduce the motor consumption to 6kW ... but it will drive the pump at the same speed ... and water will still be pumped from A to be exactly as before.
Hope that helps!?
playing devils advocate here...but here is an extract from the reply email i just got.
Hi Martin,
I have included some info on motors and a couple of other pdf’s that you may find interesting.
3phase is no different than single phase ... the principles are exactly the same.
For motors the key points are as follows
· We take the motor to the voltage at which it was designed to operate
· Lightly loaded motors can off significant savings
· VSD driven motors can still yield significant savings ... especially if the inverter frequency is >45Hz and the motor itself is lightly loaded
· The speed of a motor is NOT compromised AS LONG AS the voltage is not taken below it’s designed level
· Torque is not reduced ...
· IF a motor was taken to way below its designed operating voltage e.g. 209V ... then slip could increase significantly = reduced speed.
· Reducing losses in a motor should in no way be confused with the task the motor has to perform. E.g. an 11kW motor running DOL, supplied at 415Vand driving a pump to move water from A to B might reasonably consume 7kW. Reducing the voltage to the motor to 380V might reduce the motor consumption to 6kW ... but it will drive the pump at the same speed ... and water will still be pumped from A to be exactly as before.
Hope that helps!?