Last edited:
Not according to 4D5Strictly speaking method C is 19.5 amps.
If the rcbo feeds the fans directly than they can be treated like any "End of line" appliance and overload protection omitted. Short circuit protection only required and the 20 amp RCBO covers thatI was wondering if there were FCU's by the fans and that overload protection was provided that way.
It would be oversized if the 1.5mm was connected to a circuit where the loading can't be controlled directly, like a socket circuit socketIt's likely the RCBO is oversized but can't be sure without knowing more about the fans who knows.
In principle that's not an issue. Both fans won't take more than an amp or 2.Well under the capacity of the cable and the rcbo. The issue is, is the cable going to be protected properly under overload and short circuit conditions. It is Interesting how unconventional situations (like the OP, s) force us to look at a situation that we all know is instinctively wrong but can't immediately explain why (talking about myself here). Then we end up "going back to the drawing board" and having to figure out again.. "Why is this wrong?". Good exercise though!!If the OP has a clamp meter it would be interesting to know the current draw with both fans on.
That's 3-core as in 3 phase conductors, not as in T&E.Is it not 17.5 amps for a 3 core or am I losing plot again?!
You are most definately not losing the plot. It's there in black and white (or purple and white). But I think the key is that that 3 core is referring to 3 "loaded" conductors, as in 3 phase, whereas the 3 core referred to by the OP is containing just 2 loaded conductors
Does it not say 19.5 amps in the table "Tim Howard" posted?Not according to 4D5
It does, but that's Table 4D2A, not 4D5Does it not say 19.5 amps in the table "Tim Howard" posted?
Thank you for talking that through. I was certainly thinking in terms of overload and fault protection. I get that overload protection could technically be omitted. If (as in the case of many fans) the manufacturer advises 3 amp protection it still doesn't sit right with me that that 60 amps could theoretically flow (B curve) before it shuts off.The issue is, is the cable going to be protected properly under overload and short circuit conditions. It is Interesting how unconventional situations (like the OP, s) force us to look at a situation that we all know is instinctively wrong but can't immediately explain why (talking about myself here). Then we end up "going back to the drawing board" and having to figure out again.. "Why is this wrong?". Good exercise though!!
My bad - trouble with using app, too easy to choose wrong table.It does, but that's Table 4D2A, not 4D5
Then I stand corrected. I was, nt aware you had different tables for calculating current capacity.It does, but that's Table 4D2A, not 4D5
There are different cable types, so there have to be different tables.Then I stand corrected. I was, nt aware you had different tables for calculating current capacity.
That's a valid point actually as technically all motors should have overload protection. But the wattage of a standard 4" fan is very low.Should it jam its internal impedence will prevent large currents from flowing and if they did the fan windings would likely burn out long before the supply cable would be troubled. In fact you will sometimes come across fans that have "stuck" and on being released they carry on working. High internal impedence prevents the from burning outIs there a remote possibility of more current being drawn if the if the fan jammed or the windings were damaged and it failed to properly start and just hummed I wonder. Probably unlikely and academic.
Interestingly 4D2A conforms exactly with the table we use here (ROI) for pvc insulated cablesThere are different cable types, so there have to be different tables.