BS88 max ZS table for fuses over 63A TT or not TT | Page 2 | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss BS88 max ZS table for fuses over 63A TT or not TT in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

John-

-
Joined
Jan 13, 2019
Messages
196
Reaction score
48
Location
Uk
Hi

First time with this kind of a job for me.

I have a scenario where i am planning to install about 50m 25mm TPN from a TNCS supply to supply a small metal container housing TPN pump control gear to control two TP 24KW .8 PF pumps (to be fair one is a 15kw, but allowance to swap out one for a bigger one later). Design Current and Volt drop so far state 25mm will be fine.

Because of the distance i would have thought exporting PME would not be a good idea and was going to make it TT as there would be metal railings, the container itself etc. and we are in a very rural area, but...

Speaking with the Pump installers supplying the control gear they do not convert to TT, they always use the earth supplied - but to be fair they are also very close to the supply and have very low ZS.

I have not yet measured the ZS (nor prospective), but i expect ZS will be .2 or above and the supply fuses i am told are 100A, newly installed by DNO. The client took responsibility for this.

First Q, if i am to rely on the suppliers fuses (to protect only the cable between the meter room and the metal cabinet) and install only an isolator at the mains intake to isolate the supply, does anyone have any charts available please that cover Max Earth fault Loop impedance values for the BS88 fuses? Regs book only goes to 63A. BTW the pumps are individually OC protected in the control gear and internal wiring in the control gear to this point is also 25mm.

Also how do i tell what version fuses they are without breaking the seals?

I do not like the idea of leaving the suppliers fuse as the only means of protection for the 50m run of cable into the control gear - it just feels wrong?

I need to confirm but i am pretty sure there is a lockout on the control gear so that both pumps do not start at the same time. So even at 43A (one pump starting) there is a lot of load for about 10 seconds or so TBA.

So if i look at putting in an MCB at the meter end, i need to be sure that they will discriminate (something the pump guys said you will not guarantee even if you had scope to lower the rating of the MCB to 80A) between DNOs and mine and i tend to agree. The pumps, whilst having a slow feature start, can draw a heck of a lot of current on start up, meaning that a C Type MCB maybe the only reliable option, even assuming that the pumps do not start simultaneously. .22 Max ZS for a 100A Ctype, so an MCB may not be an option anyway, may already be too high for the length of riun and Ze. So if cannot discriminate or be selective, what is the point of having additional OC at the meter - that is my thinking. If worst happens and there are issues, i can leave BS88 fuses on site to replace any that go. If they do go though, that's going to be one hell of a fault or lightning strike most likely needing more than just a fuse...

So assuming the maz ZS for the 100A 88 fuses is greater than that measured at the end of the cable supplying the isolator for the control equipment, then TT would not be needed. If the max ZS was lower than the calculated value, and increasing the cable size was not practicable, then I will have to make it a TT and supply a 100mA S type RCD when it comes into the cabin, disconnecting PME and staking it.

Welcome yo ur thoughts please.

Thanks.

John
 
Another option would be parallel runs of 16mm SWA or similar for each pump if that would allow 50A switch-fuses at supply to disconnect, but location for isolation might require another one closer, etc.
Overloads are already provided in the controller.
The run should not be anywhere near 100m...
More worryingly for me right now is that our answers do not match, inclined to think that it is my maths not yours :).

I would love to have a look at your code, but right now i need to get my head around what i am doing wrong here...

I found some bracketing errors and sorted those but still not matching. Then i realised that i may not have solved the parallel resistance values correctly for A, B and C?

I am now wondering my assumption that B and C are a simple series circuit in parallel with A is the issue:

This is the formula i used

r1 + (1/((1/(B + C)) + (1/A))) = r1+r2

r1 is in series with A, B and C so no special care needed for r1.

A has a parallel path back with B and C. And B and C are in series, but collectively in parallel with A.

Any ideas please?

[ElectriciansForums.net] BS88 max ZS table for fuses over 63A TT or not TT


This is the spreadsheet with the formulas revealed-: -

[ElectriciansForums.net] BS88 max ZS table for fuses over 63A TT or not TT

Cheers

John
 
Thank you , that would be great :).

I didn't know if it was more complex, along the lines with this example - but it seem you agree with me and therefore it is not: -

[ElectriciansForums.net] BS88 max ZS table for fuses over 63A TT or not TT


If my math is correct i am scuppered anyway, because at just after 40m 5 core 35mm i exceed max ZS just after 40m away form the supply: -

[ElectriciansForums.net] BS88 max ZS table for fuses over 63A TT or not TT
 

Attachments

  • [ElectriciansForums.net] BS88 max ZS table for fuses over 63A TT or not TT
    1626091286581.png
    47.7 KB · Views: 20
Checking the numbers I used before getting 0.104 ohm at 96.7m of 107m we have:
R1 = 0.55 * 96.7 / 1000 = 0.053185
A = 1.6 * 96.7 / 1000 = 0.15472
B = 1.6 * (107 - 96.7) / 1000 = 0.01648
C = 0.55 * 107 / 1000 = 0.05885
B+C = 0.07533
R2 = A||(B+C) = 0.050663
R1+R2 = 0.103848 which is 0.104 ohm to 3 digits.
 
Overloads are already provided in the controller.
It is for fault protection, and to prevent a fault taking out the DNO fuse (which is basically the same as protecting your own 100A fused-switch).
The run should not be anywhere near 100m...
More worryingly for me right now is that our answers do not match, inclined to think that it is my maths not yours :).
Try it with some of the numbers I just did to see if they agree at all, I can post my script later as text if anyone wants to play with it. In the mean time I re-ran a manual calculation for the solution my script found and it seems to make sense.
 
OK, got my script and edited to add end-of-cable result, ran with your values:
Enter line R1 in mOhm/m .55
Enter CPC R2 in mOhm/m .55
Enter armour R2 in mOhm/m 1.6
Enter length in meters 100
Maximum fault R1+R2 = 0.097 at 90.4 meters
End fault R1+R2 = 0.096 at 100.0 meters
 

Reply to BS88 max ZS table for fuses over 63A TT or not TT in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar Threads

  • Question
Generally speaking local earthing will rarely be below a couple of ohms, so in parallel with a TN-S sub-ohm value will make little difference...
Replies
4
Views
609
I can imagine it just disappearing (loudly) under short circuit conditions, then the resulting blast/plasma etc. casing the busbars to flash over...
Replies
13
Views
580
  • Question
Not sure if I’ve understood this properly, but it appears to have parallels with my own installation. I highly dislike the idea of feeding SP...
2
Replies
49
Views
5K
  • Question
It is a TNS system, the earth rod is providing an earth reference to make on epile of the supply neutral and is not part of the earth fault loop...
Replies
20
Views
5K
davesparks
D
Just stick the 63amp fused connector before the Henley block , or Lucy block as you call it, and your all good, as for your 2nd point, , the...
Replies
1
Views
677

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock    No Thanks