Discuss EICR - Help on my Request for Electrical Safety Alternatives and Quotes in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net
But if that extra cable only feeds one point then it is not a radial circuit but is a completely compliant spur from the ring.
So yes, it is questionable.
You need to look at Appendix 15 section A in the regs. It clearly states 'An unfused spur may be connected to the origin of the circuit in the distribution board'.
You need to look at Appendix 15 section A in the regs. It clearly states 'An unfused spur may be connected to the origin of the circuit in the distribution board'.
Great, but that is not what it says in the regulations or the supporting publications. An EICR should be carried out in accordance with the regulations, not the opinion of a faceless stranger on a forum.
You need to look at Appendix 15 section A in the regs. It clearly states 'An unfused spur may be connected to the origin of the circuit in the distribution board'.
Appendix 15 is informative, not normative, and therefore does NOT form part of the Wiring Regulations.
Nobody is saying it can't be, my point is that when a (spur) is taken from the ring final's ocpd rather than from a point on that ring, it's more like a radial.
Apart from sharing the same ocpd it has no relation to the load of the ring.
If the ring was cut, would this then be 3 radials ? or 3 spurs ?
Ring and radial together in the same mcb.
Shouldn't he have said ring and spur ???
Attachments
1714053006606.png
144.1 KB
· Views: 4
Reply to EICR - Help on my Request for Electrical Safety Alternatives and Quotes in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc