I would suggest you look to doing the 17th edition straight away.
Your application compared with anyone with the 17th will suffer straight away making it an easy refusal for a prospective employer.
It's nice being recognised as not one of the highest contributors on the forum - makes all my efforts at contributing to relevant conversations only and not --- for tat seem pointless!
Every push being made to this forum is just making it sink further.
I'll be parking my membership way before...
When the only argument for one type of a circuit is due to a fault in the other we've got to consider the alternative.
Personally I don't have a preference, I put selection down to functionality, demand and use.
But I do always inform people with the pro's and con's of both.
If your +1 for a ring final requires a fault to be in the radial then look at it this way.
Radial.
Break in cpc = socket outlet with no cpc = risk of electric shock = RCD* disconnect when imbalance occurs.
Ring final.
Break in ring final = no detection of fault as only one line conductor...
Have you heard further on the development on the Domestic NVQ Level 3 Howard?
Since my submission of information for the assessment I have heard nothing, even my useless C&G EV hasn't heard of it!
No.
That's when their co-ordination with the QCF requirements dictated by NoS will be re-reviewed and it is likely that the unit no.s will change, that is all.
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc