One of my clients has decided he wants this kind of set up, one for a cupboard and one for the garage.
Ive tried steering him towards PIR but he not to keen on them.
Does anybody know of a sleek solution to this problem?
Ive searched on the internets but all of the switches ive found for this...
so what about, i take the tncs supply from the garage (2.5mm 3 core armour). This would supply earth to all of the circuits only. And then seperatley i connect a 10mm earth onto the greenhouse frame and then into a earth rod?
Right that makes perfect sense, thanks.
But, as ive already said, (to much hilarity) the greenhouse is not on a plinth, so why would this apply?
Am i missing something here? (apart from a brain)
would you like to elaborate on what yous are talking about?
you've mentioned this concrete plinth idea. (which ive never heard of)
Why would an extraneous conductive part not need earthed if sited on a concrete plinth? Wheres the logic?
just checked the pictures, theres no slab, its right on the dirt.
Ive looked into to this >22k ohm scenario but what about if the guy is goin to be watering his plants in there, will that not increase the chances of it being under the 22
Customer wants to take power from an existing garage (with board) to supply a greenhouse, to be fitted with ip rated switchgear.
The greenhouse is made of aluminium.
Since this is an extraneous conductive part am i right in thinking that the aluminium frame would require a 10mm bond at least...
so does that mean that this flat actually has 3 installation what with the board that has one side regular supply, other side off peak, and then another board regular supply?
Well, would that not mean that only electricians who lived through the 70s till present day could do an eicr?
I do understand broadly what you mean,and i agree that this qualities you mention would be very valuable, but it doesnt seem like a practical approach.
At the end of the day, people are...
well thats what im trying to gather the now, but i think that if you dont ask questions then you will never learn anything.
Even if it might seem ridiculous to other people.
I think its worse to ignore your own ignorance?
thanks for your reply.
i just meant that it would be a fail without the verification?
I would note it as a c2.
it can be clearly seen where it enters and the bond is not there.
Maybe it attaches somewhere else in the house (after the "t", who knows)
I dont think i would mark it down as...
haha, maybe so.
specifically im talking about the section of the eicr that asks for the details of the main switch (its before the circuit chart page and test results)
It asks for the main switch details.
So if you have two different boards with different main switches then my thinking is that...
Hi there, im looking some general advice related to this eicr.
im a bit lossed here, so would it be 2 eicr?
or do i just splice two sheets together with the relevant information?
on a seperate not i also noticed today when i had a wee look that his main water bond cannot be verified, is this a...
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc