Maybe I am wrong, but
not sure why car chargers come into it
that note is just pointing out that bs7671 doesn't overrule building regs in general, presumably to prevent confusion where building regs are stricter
you can't have a deviation from building regulations as they are statutory laws...
compliance or otherwise with Part M of the statutory building regs is entirely unrelated to compliance with BS7671.
therefore recording that as a departure would be incorrect, as there is no BS7671 reg that you have not followed.
I thought the same from memory but after checking it doesn't seem to apply to overload current. Do manufacturers specify a 1362 fuse for overload protection eg shorted windings as well?
Are they run off a 6A lighting circuit? I know it doesn't answer your question, but EDIT I think I misremembered - 3A fuse operates quicker than 6A MCB for overload currents - 7A would blow a 3A fuse in 0.05 seconds but would take 3600 for the 6A MCB to trip.
However although there's no need to...
This does sound grey area, you can swap as many as you like as long as you don't add new socket outlets, but converting a single to a double kind of adds a second outlet even if no extra accessory.
Regarding the deviation, omission of rcd protection where it is required is not a deviation. A...
If it's not adding any new wiring or socket outlets why the requirement for rcd protection? Is that something the customer requested? If so they should pay for the cu change.
Part m is pretty clear.
For a new dwelling that may be visited by persons of reduced mobility ie new build and conversion from non domestic, the heights are prescribed. For an existing, you aren't allowed to be less compliant after than you were before.
For feelings designed for disabled people...
It's ok with a proper consumer unit backed up by a cutout fuse. The cutout fuse protects the MCB as it would also blow in the case of a short circuit outgoing the mcb. Ie no discrimination at high currents.
Also the measured pscc can often end up higher than what would actually flow in these...
Yep that's basically the definition of a circuit. See the other thread for a philosophical discussion.
If you have two piles of sugar and you mix them together, how many piles of sugar do you have?
If they had spent that half an hour reading the hants fire report instead of guessing they would realise that they don't have a clue what they're on about.
Lost n will be discovered very fast. Lost e would not be. So it makes sense to combine as long as you trust your equipotential zone and bonding.
So you could say pme was a safety improvement, a bit like putting your smoke alarms on the lighting circuit.
Has anyone got figures for death by pme...
When assessing an installation you can only look at the current state, not imagine other designs it might have had in the past and decide if the structure of the installation was redefined in some way.
you can run as many cables back to the CU as you can comfortably terminate, doesn't matter if one goes to the loft, one to the back of the house and one to the front of the house, it's as good as having a normal one dimensional radial.
I like to improve my understanding of the regs, but this...
The purpose of a well designed form is to make sure you only have to think about one thing at a time.
Therefore when filling it in you should do the full calculation, and when measuring the zs all you do is measure and fill in. Then to determine compliance you just compare the two without any...
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc