OP
Smugley
Yep, the 1.0mm R1+R2 calculation was a bit annoying. Couldn't work out if it was a mistake in the paper or they were expecting you to work it out from the data provided. In the end I just estimated it to be 18 milliohms per metre.
(edit: By the way, the true value is 18.1 milliohms. So multiplying the 10mm conductor value by 10 (giving 18.3) would get you pretty close. I did it the other way by multiplying the 1.5mm value by 1.5 (giving 18.15). But just estimated 18 as there is not an exact linear relationship between size and resistance. Don't know if we'll ever know what they were really expecting!)
I thought the exam was actually quite straightforward - not many very difficult questions, and the scenario was nice and simple. If you've done half a dozen past papers you've probably seen about 75% of the questions before, in one form or another. Kicking myself cos I wrote down IP4X instead of IPX4 for the bathroom light. Just rushed and not concentrating.
(edit: By the way, the true value is 18.1 milliohms. So multiplying the 10mm conductor value by 10 (giving 18.3) would get you pretty close. I did it the other way by multiplying the 1.5mm value by 1.5 (giving 18.15). But just estimated 18 as there is not an exact linear relationship between size and resistance. Don't know if we'll ever know what they were really expecting!)
I thought the exam was actually quite straightforward - not many very difficult questions, and the scenario was nice and simple. If you've done half a dozen past papers you've probably seen about 75% of the questions before, in one form or another. Kicking myself cos I wrote down IP4X instead of IPX4 for the bathroom light. Just rushed and not concentrating.
Last edited by a moderator: