AC current flow

[Monkeyblaine]

Im having a little trouble understanding AC current flow... My understanding is that the electrons jiggle backwards and forwards due to the waveform of AC, so I don't understand why there is a need for a neutral as the electrons don't need a return path as they don't actually move anywhere unlike in a DC circuit where they move round and round... If someone could correct my understanding of this I'd muchly appreciate it.

 

[Darkwood]

your attatchment is invalid Rich and i dont mean that personally ... it asks you to contact the admin'

 

[Richard Burns]

your attatchment is invalid Rich and i dont mean that personally ... it asks you to contact the admin'

Sorry about that, I can view it, maybe it was too big (249kB)?
Oh well I tried!

 

[Monkeyblaine]

Neutral push!

Would I be right in saying that during the negative half cycle and the line conductor is at -230v RMS this is the attracting force which alternates the voltage and in a way sort of sucks the current the opposite direction (for argument sake) back through the neural and keeps alternating every 100th of a second, in a 50hz supply??

 

[Des 56]

Re: Neutral push!

Maybe,instead of thinking of a sucking force.try ignoring the actual neutral conductor

Try thinking about the star point of the transformer where the neutral originates,then imagine your single phase supply being connected directly onto the windings at that transformer,then picture the current and voltage as in the sine wave of the alternating cycles,at that transformer,it may help you this way

 

[Monkeyblaine]

Re: Neutral push!

Ok I understand that. But am still right in saying during the negative half cycle this is when the current changes direction and heads back up the neutral though the load then through the line. And it's because of this negative half cycle (-230v) that's the reason it is pushed back the other way.

 

[Knobhead]

Re: Neutral push!

Four threads on the same subject, five if you include the ones Marvo merged and you still haven’t grasped it.
This is getting beyond a joke.

 

[Monkeyblaine]

Re: Neutral push!

Always slightly different actually just being precise. Thanks for your input though.

 

[Marvo]

I've merged another 3 topics that are all about the same subject. If you have any more questions on basic electrical theory please just append to this thread, it's getting very confusing for the members who are posting replies and trying to help you out.....and the crowd is getting restless.

Just out of interest did you check out the free books I linked to in this post yet??

 

[Monkeyblaine]

Thanks to everyone who has posted replys they have really cleared things up for me. Special thanks to darkwood and Marvo. Sorry where my posts were merged I missed them. Thanks again.

 

[Darkwood]

Your welcome but word of advice is just learn the basics how it was taught and be very careful you dont mix quantum theory with AC theory as they will give complete different opposing answers, no disrepect but quantum for the moment is too advanced for you so stick to the concept that electrons wizz around, its taught like this because it was originally believed to be the case but also it has been kept this where due to its concept can be understood better, but which ever method you learn the calcs are the same and thats the info thats important.
Its good though to see enthusiasm in the younger generation to want to understand further about the fundementals and not just tie their learning off once they know the REG' no#.

 

[Marvo]

Sorry where my posts were merged I missed them.

All your posts (as well as everyone else's) are still here, they're just all merged into this one thread.
I left your 'ohms law thread' standing separate here as it had merit as a separate topic.

 

[Monkeyblaine]

Thanks darkwood I'll take your advice with an underlying desire to learn more, when I'm ready. Thanks again.