Adding a light to a circuit with no earth

[Midwest]

Well I'd say if it's selv then the cpc is required to be not connected to the primary side of the source

Just a thought Is that a double negative thing?

 

[Midwest]

I am aware that such labels are for sale - my point is that they have no basis within BS7671.

That's not a reason, not to have them. Anything that makes things which are unclear more clear, must be grasped,

 

[Wilko]

My thought is any new cable must have a cpc, and the cpc must be tested and confirmed for connectivity to the MET. And these are new cables to the new downlight positions...

 

[Andy78]

That's not a reason, not to have them. Anything that makes things which are unclear more clear, must be grasped,

They certainly don't not make things less unclear than they wouldn't have not been if they weren't there at all.

 

[robo83]

Thanks for all the replies.

 

[Midwest]

They certainly don't not make things less unclear than they wouldn't have not been if they weren't there at all.

Arrgh you missed the point;

 

[Midwest]

On this point, would running a cable from a 12v dc transformer, to a remote luminaire require a cpc?

Any more technical points on the above?

 

[Risteard]

That's not a reason, not to have them. Anything that makes things which are unclear more clear, must be grasped,

There's no reason to prescribe a label for a prohibited arrangement though.