Advice on Installation | Page 5 | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss Advice on Installation in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Joined
Dec 27, 2018
Messages
79
Reaction score
31
Location
Kent
Hi Folks,

If I'm extending a lighting circuit, (adding two pendants and an outside light) from an existing pendant but the board doesn't have any protection (an old BS3036 fuse board) What's the best way to add RCD protection?

The new cable for the switches can't buried more tore than 50mm deep and I don't want to whack an RCD FCU anywhere as they are quite bulky.

What would be the best course of action to take to install this circuit so it complies with the Regs?

Thanks,
T
 
Maybe someone belonging to one of the scams can call their tech help and ask why they are no longer acceptable.

That'll get them confused for sure.
Although I didn't ask the question directly, when I called my scheme yesterday their advice was to continue to use RCD FCUs and sockets.

Specifically I asked them if I had to protect a complete lighting circuit if making an addition.

Their answer was that I could use an RCD FCU from the point of the addition, as I would do with additional sockets.

This was before people raised the issue of them not being listed as an approved device.
Today I'm going to be installing an RCD fused spur to protect some exterior lighting, and earlier in the year I installed an RCD fused spur to protect some new lighting internally at the same property. These changes were designed and quoted for last year and as such have to comply with the 17th edition amendment 3, so I'm pretty happy with my decision to progress as planned.

But given all work designed after 31st December 2018 has to comply with the 18th, using RCD socket outlets and fused spurs to provide additional protection is no longer an option since they are not one of the listed standards.

So... in the event that something bad happened and someone was say injured or killed, how would you defend your decision to ignore the regulations by installing a device which is not listed as suitable for providing additional protection?
Today I'm going to be installing an RCD fused spur to protect some exterior lighting, and earlier in the year I installed an RCD fused spur to protect some new lighting internally at the same property. These changes were designed and quoted for last year and as such have to comply with the 17th edition amendment 3, so I'm pretty happy with my decision to progress as planned.

But given all work designed after 31st December 2018 has to comply with the 18th, using RCD socket outlets and fused spurs to provide additional protection is no longer an option since they are not one of the listed standards.

So... in the event that something bad happened and someone was say injured or killed, how would you defend your decision to ignore the regulations by installing a device which is not listed as suitable for providing additional protection?

I appreciate your stance. You have to do what you feel comfortable with.

Personally I have taken professional, recorded, advise and will continue to use these devices.

I think we both know there is no issue in using them it is simply a case of covering ones rear.

Maybe a call to your scheme will put your mind at rest and make your life a little easier.
 
I appreciate your stance. You have to do what you feel comfortable with.

Personally I have no problem using them as they've been used for years and are still on sale.

I think we both know there is no issue in using them it is simply a case of covering ones rear.

And that is exactly my concern. As @spinlondon said, I think it's an error but as it stands using them appears to contravene the regs so absolutely... a$$ armour is needed I feel.
 
Today I'm going to be installing an RCD fused spur to protect some exterior lighting, and earlier in the year I installed an RCD fused spur to protect some new lighting internally at the same property. These changes were designed and quoted for last year and as such have to comply with the 17th edition amendment 3, so I'm pretty happy with my decision to progress as planned.

But given all work designed after 31st December 2018 has to comply with the 18th, using RCD socket outlets and fused spurs to provide additional protection is no longer an option since they are not one of the listed standards.

So... in the event that something bad happened and someone was say injured or killed, how would you defend your decision to ignore the regulations by installing a device which is not listed as suitable for providing additional protection?
So how is this "something bad" going to happen then? How is using an RCD socket, which may or may not have a different latching system, going to result in an accident or death any more than using an RCD at the origin in the CU? How much chance do you think there is, of you ending up in court, or even if you did getting prosecuted, really?? It is far more responsible to do the job using an RCD socket, properly tested, than to leave your customer in the clutches of Dodgy Dave, as you call him. I think some people on here must live in a world of perpetual fear of prosecution.
 
OK guys, an update

BG Electrical Tech support agree with my suggestion that a FCU with an RCD is perfectly acceptable.

They have suggested that where the socket could be used for equipment such as lawnmowers that the FCU should have a non-latched RCD. The reason being that if the power drops out momentarily it will not be restored as the relay will trip out and not reset. This will prevent something like a lawnmower suddenly starting up with someone's hand in the cutting area.

The FCU with RCD protection are manufactured in latched or unlatched type. An unlatched needs to be mechanically reset in the event of a power loss, whereas a latched does not trip in the event of a power loss and should be used for freezers, and other equipment that it would be preferable to have this feature.

With regards to 61008 / 61009 they state that this applies to RCDs intended for Consumer Units.

They have confirmed that their units trip in the requisite time and will be happy to supply a manufacturers statement to support a risk assessment as I outlined earlier. I think they would also be prepared to give an opinion on the risk assessment as well.

Unable to contact the IET as they are not in until Friday


SC
You are permitted to install a design that does not comply with all or part of BS7671 provided that the proposed arrangement provides an equal or better level of safety. In determining how to install the circuit effectively you are undertaking a Designer role, albeit primarily following guidelines.
With no offence intended you already know that BS7671 has the same status a an ACOP and thus it is not a legal requirement to comply. The onus as stated above is to demonstrate that your proposed arrangement is no less safe.

In respect of the FCU it will undertake the Requirement of having a 30mA RCD in the cct, in this case within the FCU. The FCU is manufactured to BS EN Standards and so is a compliant fitting.

The fitting of a non-latched RCD completes the circle.
 
"They have suggested that where the socket could be used for equipment such as lawnmowers that the FCU should have a non-latched RCD. The reason being that if the power drops out momentarily it will not be restored as the relay will trip out and not reset. This will prevent something like a lawnmower suddenly starting up with someone's hand in the cutting area." So when the power goes off momentarily due to a DNO problem, and the guy cutting the lawn pokes his hand in, the non-latching but perfectly "acceptable" RCD in the CU remains un-tripped because it is latched and he gets his fingers chopped off. Now, we all know that this won't happen because the lawnmower has it's own safety latch, so what was the point of them saying that? I think they will all disappear up their own butts soon.
 

Reply to Advice on Installation in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

News and Offers from Sponsors

  • Sticky
  • Article
Wicked I've just actually looked through it and it's very smart. Some good stuff in it. There's a tile association company that do a magazine...
Replies
2
Views
315
  • Article
OFFICIAL SPONSORS These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then...
Replies
0
Views
295
  • Article
Hi everyone, Another weekend, another sale! Get ready for colder days with Haverland Radiators, combining efficiency with modern design. Keep...
Replies
0
Views
361

Similar threads

He said something about a fused something as the lights hardly take anything .. I told him was mostly cordless tools so just chargers ..told him...
Replies
11
Views
584
  • Question
I wonder if a double row Fusebox would fit in there…
Replies
6
Views
667

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top