... advice on this situation please | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss ... advice on this situation please in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Joined
Sep 30, 2018
Messages
3
Reaction score
2
Location
sussex
Evening,
Im working for a builder on a kitchen extension..

Now the usual procedure with this building contractor is do the essential checks (bonding, Ze ect) make sure its up to scratch and fit a separate board to feed my new circuits... nice and simple

However im just finishing the first fix and it turns out the client expects the house board to also be updated (rewireable fuses and no RCD protection). The builders spec doesn’t specifically ask for this so its not been included by him but hey ho its an extra for me at the end of the day.

The place is a big house and while doing a walking round it is evident that there is ongoing work by other contractors in the bedrooms and additional en suits/wetrooms. Which started last year prior to me and is still not finished.

There has been a shed load of electrical work carried out in these new suits (underfloor heating, towel rails, downlights, cabinet lighting, PIR switching/dimmers and wall lighting).

As I mentioned no RCD protection is installed so no wonder the client is fairly adamant the board change is included in my builders spec.

I asked for any certification issued to the client for works carried out but its not been done.

The work seems ok from what I can see...
Then I found metal cased double insulated wall lights in the bathrooms that have not been installed correctly with the t and e stripped and brw/blu conductors ran into the fitting (no grommet) and connected with wagos. One knock of the fittings and the case could become live with pipe work and towel rails in reaching distance.

Pulled it up as being dangerous with the client and asked why the installation was started without at the very least an RCD fitted in the first place. They said that the previous electrician who did the work was aware of the requirement for RCD protection but was told by the client that the board was being upgraded so don’t worry.

... would you put yourself in this position?
I wouldn’t

Way I see it I have a few options

1. Remove the dangerous fittings, isolate the feeds at the dimmer and risk the client reinstalling them back himself. Reinstalling them properly will be difficult as the plastic joint box and rubber cable sleave has been thrown and with the fitting being mounted on espensive tiles, hes not going to want to leave a hole where they was fitted.
Then test the lot and then do the board change.

2. Be persistent and ask for the previous electrician to rectify the lights, test the work and issue a certificate taking responsibility for the works.

3. Knock the board change on the head all together and tell the client to get the electrician back to do it and certify his work.
I have never certificated other peoples work and I really don't want to start now.

Any advice?
Cheers
 
Good advice from members, however I know how important work from builders is vital to some trade persons.

I don't understand any electrician carrying out non compliant works, on the promise it'll all be alright, don't worry.

I would suggest @youngz your works cannot proceed as is at the moment. Its a large property with various existing circuits, new works have been carried out, and some been installed non compliant, and you have been asked along with other things, to install a replacement CU.

I would also suggest, that if you wish to proceed with the work, that an EICR must be carried before any more new works are down. If you client agrees it might be useful, if this survey was done by another third party, so your not seen as making something out of this, because of the earlier issues.

If not, I would do as the others said, and decline the work.
 
Danger notice. Put something in writing to customer and builder PDQ to cover yourself and then decide how you are prepared to proceed. Sods law dictates that if anyone gets a shock you will be blamed and they will deny all knowledge of your conversations!
 
Danger notice. Put something in writing to customer and builder PDQ to cover yourself and then decide how you are prepared to proceed. Sods law dictates that if anyone gets a shock you will be blamed and they will deny all knowledge of your conversations!
Good advice, if there was ever a best case of CYA this rates one of the best examples.
 

Reply to ... advice on this situation please in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

News and Offers from Sponsors

  • Article
Join us at electronica 2024 in Munich! Since 1964, electronica has been the premier event for technology enthusiasts and industry professionals...
    • Like
Replies
0
Views
388
  • Sticky
  • Article
Good to know thanks, one can never have enough places to source parts from!
Replies
4
Views
970
  • Article
OFFICIAL SPONSORS These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then...
Replies
0
Views
1K

Similar threads

Given that, it probably makes sense to TT the shed, unless you can be sure it doesn't act as an extraneous-conductive-part. (The SWA won't have...
Replies
10
Views
724
It applies to commercial if it shares the same supply as a dwelling.
Replies
4
Views
578

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top