N
nicebutdim
The same could be for an average British semi. Maybe with two lighting circuits - but two are not required. This gives five circuits. Installation costs are then cut right down.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Discuss AFDD in 18th 2nd Amendment in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net
The same could be for an average British semi. Maybe with two lighting circuits - but two are not required. This gives five circuits. Installation costs are then cut right down.
And it satisfies Regulation 531.3.2(iii). Why don't you tootle off and read it.I have to get you to think and read. Your minds is all over the place.
Back to the point. The design conforms 100% to the 18th and its amendments, offering full AFDD protection to sockets. If you cannot see that why are doing the job you are in?
You can't even answer the question @westward10 posted so you clearly have no access to the regs and anyone who quotes the regs as legal clearly has no understanding of their legal statusI have to get you to think and read. Your minds is all over the place.
Back to the point. The design conforms 100% to the 18th and its amendments, offering full AFDD protection to sockets. If you cannot see that why are doing the job you are in?
Football on TV. First things first.@John-SJW you've gone quiet.
So you are stumped then as your circuit design is flawed and you don't know why.Football on TV. First things first.
I the design does not conform to the 18th with amendments, then he can tell us where.You can't even answer the question @westward10 posted
Your design is flawed and is not likely to 100% comply with the 18th Ed as you have stated multiple times.I the design does not conform to the 18th with amendments, then he can tell us where.
So far no has. All I have read is innane circular babble though. Now back to watching the football.
You cannot explain why you think this. A bit of a know-it-all eh!So you are stumped then as your circuit design is flawed and you don't know why.
You cannot explain why you think this. A bit of a know-it-all eh!
And your proposed appliances tot up to?531.3.2
(iii) in order to avoid unwanted tripping by protective conductor currents and/or earth leakage currents, the accumulation of such currents downstream
of the RCD shall not be more than 30% of the rated residual operating current.
And?
Yes it is yours you have not answered any question that has been posted so far and have only chosen to respond with condescending comments about other peoples knowledge of the subjectI the design does not conform to the 18th with amendments, then he can tell us where.
So far no has. All I have read is innane circular babble though. Now back to watching the football.
Sorry, I have to disagree with you, but I wouldn't need to question it.I'd question the ability of anyone designing such an installation.
Reply to AFDD in 18th 2nd Amendment in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net