I'm always a bit dubious when someone charges to test their software. This didn't happen to me but has happened to others. I'd be worried that if the software company needs funding to demonstrate their products that they wouldn't have enough cash to complete the final version. Meanwhile they would be holding my data and charging me for access to the data if I decide not to continue subscribing to their software.
I haven't jumped to any conclusions, I tried the system it wasn't for me - I don't respond well to Non disclosure agreements being waved in my face at the mention of an open discussion about what installers would need from a database on this forum. It's just not the way I do business.
For a system to be worthwile to me I need it to:
be able to access a users manual to see how to get the best out of a system
measure accurately from Google Earth and identify orientation and pitch
price accurately, building in different options
enable me to complete online risk assessments and method statements
and that's just to start with.
All the databases that I've looked at and tried recently haven't come close to the needs of an installer working on pv to MCS standards. I already have complete customer files that I add all documents to as I go along and a master list of documents, I don't need to pay someone to hold those for me.
My question would be not how much do you value your time at but how much do you value your data?
I haven't yet seen any half truths in any posts I've read about the paperclip database. I applaud the work they have done so far but it's not for everyone and certainly not for me. Make no bones about it these guys are in it for the cash exactly the same as you and I and like you and I they will have to take the ciriticism with the praise - that's business
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7dcac/7dcac283ae5e078e1182a0e66332aebad456125b" alt="Smile :-) :-)"