Discuss Consumer Unit Installation Up to Scratch??? NICEIC approved Installer. in the Certification NICEIC, NAPIT, Stroma, BECSA Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net
With Amd 3 pfc is calculated as 230 x.95 (Cmin) = 218.5/0.3 = .73 Ka (pg. 127 GN3) Not that it makes much difference but it certainly would if you had 0.03 which is becoming more common. I think you need to set your loop test to high output as no trip loop test can be innacurate especially on Ze test.
Thanks everyone. Plenty for me to think about which is exactly what I need!
My understanding is any incoming metal service pipework needs to be earthed regardless? Incidentally, just found out my friend was charged for the bonding and meter tails upgrade whatever the requirements are!
Thanks everyone. Plenty for me to think about which is exactly what I need!
My understanding is any incoming metal service pipework needs to be earthed regardless? Incidentally, just found out my friend was charged for the bonding and meter tails upgrade whatever the requirements are!
He was more than likely stung by a not too rare company which has been badged by the naughty Niceic money grabbers
Maybe the type of courses that enable registration these days promotes standards that are questionable all too often
Cmin is the minimum voltage factor to take account of voltage variations depending on time and place, changing of transformer taps and other considerations.
Pg. 127
I don't have my copy on me at present to verify this, but remember this is only a guide book and does not form part of the Wiring Regulations, and indeed may contain errors!
@Risteard If you look in the regs at 411.4.5 411.5.4 etc. and onwards you will see Cmin is factored in to Zs x Ia < Uo x Cmin. Although they dont actually give that formula it is clear in BS7671 it is meant to be factored in by impication. btw I quoted the GN3 verbatim and page number. Although I do agree the Cmax factor may be more appropriate as a safety margin.
There is a difference between the prospective fault current and the fault current calculated from the I = U0 × Cmin /Zs formula.
In the second case this formula is being used to determine the trip time of a protective device and so should be the lowest value of fault current that may occur on the installation.
Where you are determining the prospective fault current this is to ensure that the protective device an handle this current so you are determining the maximum expected value that may occur on the installation.
Any protective device must be capable of operating quickly enough at the lowest fault current and also capable of withstanding the highest fault current.
Which comes from IEC documents - my point stands that Cmax is not a defined term within BS7671. (I don't believe even the IEC document refers to it by that name.)
Cmax is defined in guidance note 6, but not in BS7671, as far as I know; the value of 1.1 (and 0.95) is taken from a cenelec technical report "Determination of cross-sectional area of conductors and selection of protective devices" in 2011.
Cmax is defined in guidance note 6, but not in BS7671, as far as I know; the value of 1.1 (and 0.95) is taken from a cenelec technical report "Determination of cross-sectional area of conductors and selection of protective devices" in 2011.
It's just 230v x 1.1 is 253v. It's the electricity safety quality and continuity regulations which allow +10% to -6% of 230v
230v +10% is 23v
230+23v is 253v 230x 1.1 =253v
But yeah cmax isn't in bs 7671 unless I've missed it.
Despite all the discussion, going back to the op, there def seems to be some issues with the certification,
if the bonding box is ticked, but there isn't any (and they've been charged) that's an issue
I can't see why you wouldn't measure and record a ze.
They obviously haven't done any zs testing either.
Externally at least, the cu sounds like a right lash up.
All makes you wonder what else they have bodged their way through.
Thanks everyone. Plenty for me to think about which is exactly what I need!
My understanding is any incoming metal service pipework needs to be earthed regardless? Incidentally, just found out my friend was charged for the bonding and meter tails upgrade whatever the requirements are!
Hopefully it's been sorted now as they've had two years...
Reply to Consumer Unit Installation Up to Scratch??? NICEIC approved Installer. in the Certification NICEIC, NAPIT, Stroma, BECSA Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc
Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.