Could This Be A Fused Neutral? | Page 4 | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss Could This Be A Fused Neutral? in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

S

SparkyMcsparkface

Hi, came across this today, double width cutout, never seen it before. Not sure if it could be fused on the neutral or whether I am worrying with no need. Any advice appreciated. (Haven't pulled the cutout obviously, even though it isn't sealed - I have a feeling it might be too stiff to pull out anyway, maybe....)

[ElectriciansForums.net] Could This Be A Fused Neutral?
 
Interestingly the DNO's equipment installed within a customers proerty is not entirely outside the remit of 7671, however it is something that we e are not allowed to interfere with.
However we can look at it, and that is all that is required to inspect it.

Not according to the EICR schedules no!!
Seriously though, in what respects are DNO equipment within 7671 DS? I am not the most avid reader of the yellow book TBH! I tend to know what I need to know for the work I carry out.
 
Not according to the EICR schedules no!!
Seriously though, in what respects are DNO equipment within 7671 DS? I am not the most avid reader of the yellow book TBH! I tend to know what I need to know for the work I carry out.

I can't really comment on the actual regs too much until I can bothered to get my copy out of the van.

In the respect that the ukpn network design guide states that any equipment installed on a consumer's premises needs to comply with 7671. It goes on to specify that the size of the supply cable and the earth fault loop impedance need to be such that the fuse in the cutout will disconnect within 5 seconds. Outside of the consumer's premises the disconnection time is a lot longer.
This is one of the reasons they don't like installing anything within the consumer's premises these days.
If I can dig out the relevant document from my steam-powered junk heap of a computer then I'll post it up, but don't hold your breath for that.
 
I will look into that. My thinking at present is that that is possibly their (ukpn) take on it. I have my brown, red and green copies upstairs but missus is asleep and not likely to take kindly to me waking her up looking up regs! Yellow copy in van also, and it's cold and rainy so not getting that tonight!
 
You are missing my point Westward. DNOs equipment is outside of the remit of 7671. As I see it the DNOs are trying to basically come to a point in time when every one has smart meters and home visits are no longer necessary whereby defects may have been picked up on previously. Hence the inclusion of these items in the schedule. I will 'lim' it in future just for you! After lengthy discussions with the client....... obviously....

When smart meters are fully installed, they will still have a safety inspection every 2 years just like any other meter, DNO equipment gets inspected too.
 
When smart meters are fully installed, they will still have a safety inspection every 2 years just like any other meter, DNO equipment gets inspected too.

That's interesting to know Dave. Is that an across the UK thing or just SSE? Also are meters currently meant to be checked every two years? The reason I ask the last bit is I see a lot of meters with poorly installed tails with exposed inner insulation and sometimes slightly exposed conductors at the terminals. I know the logistics of planning to update where necessary must be a nightmare at times, and cannot see how each and every install would actually be checked every two years. Is it not also dependant on whether the meter reader is diligent enough to report all they see that should be updated? I suspect many can't be bothered too!

Edit: I just noticed that you used the word "still" above.
 
I wish to state that I agree with the use of the FI (Further Investigation required) code for apparent deficiencies with the DNO's equipment. In principle if fused neutrals were suspected (without getting in to whether this was a reasonable belief or otherwise) then the DNO are needed to verify this, and so further investigation without delay is required. It is also clear that this must result in an Unsatisfactory report.
 
That's interesting to know Dave. Is that an across the UK thing or just SSE? Also are meters currently meant to be checked every two years? The reason I ask the last bit is I see a lot of meters with poorly installed tails with exposed inner insulation and sometimes slightly exposed conductors at the terminals. I know the logistics of planning to update where necessary must be a nightmare at times, and cannot see how each and every install would actually be checked every two years. Is it not also dependant on whether the meter reader is diligent enough to report all they see that should be updated? I suspect many can't be bothered too!

Edit: I just noticed that you used the word "still" above.
Yes that is across all suppliers, and yes an answer to your question we do rely on DR's to pick this up if they can be bothered.
 
I wish to state that I agree with the use of the FI (Further Investigation required) code for apparent deficiencies with the DNO's equipment. In principle if fused neutrals were suspected (without getting in to whether this was a reasonable belief or otherwise) then the DNO are needed to verify this, and so further investigation without delay is required. It is also clear that this must result in an Unsatisfactory report.
Fused neutrals are being replaced by the DNO, but they are Cat B, when identified.
 
As a matter of interest what is Cat B defined as.
Westie in other words it is not classed as CAT A, exposed live parts, where they have to respond within 3hrs, I think the lead time for CATB is 2 weeks, CAT C , is when they can get there, eg broken tag on the cut out or fuse carrier.
 
Fused neutrals are being replaced by the DNO, but they are Cat B, when identified.
That may be, but the Electrician (in my view) was absolutely right to state that Further Investigation was required (in this case by the DNO). It is also clear that we then have no option but to assess the overall condition of the electrical installation as "Unsatisfactory". As such I feel that the criticism of the Electrician in this instance is grossly unfair as he acted appropriately.
 

Reply to Could This Be A Fused Neutral? in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

News and Offers from Sponsors

  • Sticky
  • Article
Wicked I've just actually looked through it and it's very smart. Some good stuff in it. There's a tile association company that do a magazine...
Replies
2
Views
299
  • Article
OFFICIAL SPONSORS These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then...
Replies
0
Views
282
  • Article
Hi everyone, Another weekend, another sale! Get ready for colder days with Haverland Radiators, combining efficiency with modern design. Keep...
Replies
0
Views
355

Similar threads

Thanks all for your comments, advice and suggestions. The following is probably pretty boring for most, and is simply a summary of how the job...
Replies
8
Views
782

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

  • exceeding voltage drop
    The cable is way undersized. If the voltage drop is detrimental to the installation I would make...
  • TT advise
    OK My take on the precautions to implement when omitting an up front RCD on a TT system. Tails...
  • SIL vs ATEX
    Good morning all, I have a question for those who are CompEx and SIL aware - I have various Ex...
This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top