Critical Feedback recent Consumer unit install Please.

[MrShine94]

Hi, I would like to know how I could improve on this board. All opinions

welcome.

 

[ipf]

Wonder why Wiska make those???

To stop 'em floppin' about.....why'd you think?

 

[magnoliafan89]

It’s the same reg that says collectively or separate. You intimidated it had to be collectively and that’s my point. If the op glanded earth seperately your post would have led him to believe he’d made an error.

I think its you who has been confused by mine and @Vortigern posts. I was asking as i said in my post because normally those in my experience who dont put the earth in with the mains tails normally have the live in a different entry to the neutral. Vortigern has simply posted the reg about this...if the OP is worth anything he wouldnt get confused

 

[Jon Bateson]

I think its you who has been confused by mine and @Vortigern posts. I was asking as i said in my post because normally those in my experience who dont put the earth in with the mains tails normally have the live in a different entry to the neutral. Vortigern has simply posted the reg about this...if the OP is worth anything he wouldnt get confused

And my point was he posted half the reg

 

[Pete999]

And my point was he posted half the reg

Agree but he gave you the Reg number, for you to find and read, at your leisure, if you ask nicely he might come to you and read it to you.

 

[The Ghost]

I am not intimating anything please try to understand that. I am quoting a reg which is slightly controversial in it's interpretation, nothing new there! However there are grounds for saying it means the earth conductor supply and live and neutral will go together into the db. The part i later quoted has NOTHING to do with the first part I quoted it is talking about another earth with SWA, nothing to do with the supply to the DB. How you conflate them together is beyond me. This is not a personal attack on you merely trying to make a point which is significant in terms of best practice and compliance and only that.

 

[The Ghost]

he’d made an error

He may well have a non compliance, I mean how do you interpret that reg. As I say it is a bit controversial and there are other threads with people divided on it. As to Wiska, you asked my point? I hoped it would be self evident but as you are being obtuse for the record the point is there is provision in the insert to comply with the reg quoted.

 

[The Ghost]

he posted half the reg

...because it has nothing to do with the first part just a proviso or note to the reg.

 

[Jon Bateson]

...because it has nothing to do with the first part just a proviso or note to the reg.

Vortigern sorry was having a bad day and being a bit of a c”@k. Shouldn’t have brought my bad mood to the forum to find a vent.

 

[DPG]

Glad everyone is friends again!
Now, what was the original question?

 

[Dustydazzler]

Did someone mention Scams