Any theory about what it's likely to say??
I feel it would be unhelpful to add to rumours and speculation at this stage.
The STA met with George Osborne's special advisor Neil O'Brien in a move to influence HM Treasury's thinking on solar, as it is understood they are calling the shots regarding the FIT review. He was briefed on solar, the LCF and pitched on the £1 emergency solar rescue plan.
Last week, the House of Commons held its regular Treasury question time where Seema Malhotra MP attacked Osborne on solar followed by a similarly terse exchange with Helen Goodman MP in the Treasury Select Committee. This much-needed pressure helps put the solar FIT on Osborne's radar.
As always, there can be little trust in what one is told or how one is received. Apparently Rudd did not want to meet renewable lobbyists due to her own discomforture at the position she found herself in. This then throws a different light on any discussions that have taken place with officials. This observation came in a personal conversation had with a highly respected independent industry commentator. His analysis is very sharp.
There may be some concessions, but as always there could be a sting in the tail. Do not forget the details included in the Consultation such as the Energy Performance requirement. A workable tariff with unworkable conditions is of little use to anyone.
The dissonance of the Governments position on renewables in relation to statements made in Paris at COP21 are well reported, as are comments from industry leaders (eg Unilever). Whether this has an influence or not remains to be seen.
I suspect that many of us will be wondering on Wednesday whether what is announced is enough to continue in the industry or change tack. What ever happens it will become a very different place.