Is it a requirement of BS 7671 to Earth SWA cable at both ends when using an integral conductor as a cpc. I don't think it is and can't find a reg which states that it is but wondering if someone could help clarify.

I was once told it was good practice to earth at both ends when using an integral cpc in case the armouring and cpc had a difference in potential and both were touched simultaneously during an earth fault prior to the disconnection device operating.

Any thoughts?
 
It is definitely good practice yes.
If the SWA is the CPC then obviously a good connection at both ends is essential. If the SWA is not the CPC it is still an exposed conductive part and must be earthed. This can be achieved by earthing at one end, usually the supply end. I always earth at both ends regardless.
 
If earthing at one end it should be the supply end of the cable as far as I know.
Earthing at both ends is not necessary, but it will help lower Zs.
 
It is definitely good practice yes.
If the SWA is the CPC then obviously a good connection at both ends is essential. If the SWA is not the CPC it is still an exposed conductive part and must be earthed. This can be achieved by earthing at one end, usually the supply end. I always earth at both ends regardless.

Is it?
 
It is as I was taught. Any exposed metal part that forms part of the wiring system.

The steel is covered by an over sheath of insulation so is not exposed. The SWA glands are an exposed conductive part until covered by the shroud.
 
The steel is covered by an over sheath of insulation so is not exposed. The SWA glands are an exposed conductive part until covered by the shroud.

This was always a point of mine whilst learning. My mentoring electricians and lecturers always maintained that the shroud was not sufficient to be relied upon to guarantee the gland would never be exposed, and that the gland, and by extension the armouring, were to be considered exposed conductive parts.

Possibly just a twisting of regulations and definitions to ensure best practice, but it's the way I was shown.
 
This was always a point of mine whilst learning. My mentoring electricians and lecturers always maintained that the shroud was not sufficient to be relied upon to guarantee the gland would never be exposed, and that the gland, and by extension the armouring, were to be considered exposed conductive parts.

Possibly just a twisting of regulations and definitions to ensure best practice, but it's the way I was shown.

A cable tie top and bottom of the shroud (doesn't look professional though) lol.


EDITED -Leesparkykent - you know the rules in the main forum for swearing, no matter how you spell it to try get around the software detection it is still not allowed, Ive altered it for you :).

Darkwood.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
[COLOR=#ff0000 said:
EDITED[/COLOR] -Leesparkykent - you know the rules in the main forum for swearing, no matter how you spell it to try get around the software detection it is still not allowed, Ive altered it for you :).

Darkwood.

Oops! :ban:Lol
 
Best EV Chargers by Electrical2Go! The official electric vehicle charger supplier.

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

Advert

YOUR Unread Posts

Daily, weekly or monthly email

Thread starter

Joined

Thread Information

Title
Earthing SWA at both ends
Prefix
N/A
Forum
Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations
Start date
Last reply date
Replies
88

Thread Tags

Advert

Thread statistics

Created
atm84,
Last reply from
Big Sausage,
Replies
88
Views
43,474

Advert

Back
Top