EICR and Supplementary Bonding. | Page 8 | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss EICR and Supplementary Bonding. in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net

Im happy to accept the views of anybody if this damn thread is closed and put to bed ...... its turned out to be like opening a whole can of worms!
 
Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo. You cannot end it on such a flawed statement.

Geoff or DSkelton is wrong merely that there interpretation seems to miss the point that section 7 of BS7671 asks for SB to be applied if the 3 conditions are not met.
You must apply 415.2 unless the three conditions are met.

This is not an interpretation; that is what it says.



All RCBOs are RCDs but not all RCDs are RCBOs.
 
Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo. You cannot end it on such a flawed statement.


You must apply 415.2 unless the three conditions are met.

This is not an interpretation; that is what it says.



All RCBOs are RCDs but not all RCDs are RCBOs.

Geoff you are clearly very opinionated. Its pretty simple, 701 require SB to 415.2, it then modifys and supplements it with further requirement's.

1) it asks for Local, this isn't mentioned in 415.2, its supplementary.

2)it asks for the SB to be connected to the terminals of the protective conductors of equipment in the location and to be connected to extraneous parts either in the location or at entry.

Its pretty explicit and clear.

Now your touch voltage concept id flawed, it obeys ohms law, end of, there no debate to be had.

The original IEC uses Ut= If(max fault current) x Rbw(resistance of cable), its been adjusted to 50/Ia by BS7671 based on certain assumptions. Now using your method Ut(touch voltage) will be a product of (If), it may result in Ut be greater than 100 volts, even 150 volts

Now install a SB and we have a Current divider, assume little current flow in the SB in relation to R2 and we have a very low Ut(touch voltage).

Little knowledge can be dangerous, don't play with touch voltages unless you fully understand them, and to advise people SB is not required, well what can i say.

Chris
 
Last edited:

Reply to EICR and Supplementary Bonding. in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net

News and Offers from Sponsors

  • Article
Join us at electronica 2024 in Munich! Since 1964, electronica has been the premier event for technology enthusiasts and industry professionals...
    • Like
Replies
0
Views
295
  • Sticky
  • Article
Good to know thanks, one can never have enough places to source parts from!
Replies
4
Views
802
  • Article
OFFICIAL SPONSORS These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then...
Replies
0
Views
838

Similar threads

  • Question
Surely one of the most important parts of supplementary bonding is to bond the radiator and hot tap/pipe to the cold one. Both the hot tap and...
Replies
32
Views
2K
In the 80's I was taught that with PME earthing arrangements we used 16mm for the main earthing conductor, some went a bit crazy and were bonding...
Replies
11
Views
2K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top