View the thread, titled "EICR - coding for a single CU" which is posted in Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations on Electricians Forums.

Interesting angle. Does anyone know if 537.1.4 was in the 16th. I have had another look at mine and i have three outgoings from the henley all done circa 1988
It's been a requirement for installations to have a means of isolation to my knowledge since at least the 14th edition.
In the 14th, if it was deemed that there was more than one installation in a consumer's premises, then each installation had to not only have a means of isolation, but also it's own overload and fault protection.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Reply to the thread, titled "EICR - coding for a single CU" which is posted in Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations on Electricians Forums.

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

Advert

Daily, weekly or monthly email

Thread starter

kingeri

Arms
-
Joined
Location
Yorkshire

Thread Information

Title
EICR - coding for a single CU
Prefix
N/A
Forum
Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations
Start date
Last reply date
Replies
16

Advert

Thread statistics

Created
kingeri,
Last reply from
plugsandsparks,
Replies
16
Views
2,609

Advert

Back
Top