Interesting angle. Does anyone know if 537.1.4 was in the 16th. I have had another look at mine and i have three outgoings from the henley all done circa 1988
It's been a requirement for installations to have a means of isolation to my knowledge since at least the 14th edition.
In the 14th, if it was deemed that there was more than one installation in a consumer's premises, then each installation had to not only have a means of isolation, but also it's own overload and fault protection.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

Advert

YOUR Unread Posts

Daily, weekly or monthly email

Thread starter

kingeri

Arms
-
Joined
Location
Yorkshire

Thread Information

Title
EICR - coding for a single CU
Prefix
N/A
Forum
Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations
Start date
Last reply date
Replies
16

Advert

Thread statistics

Created
kingeri,
Last reply from
plugsandsparks,
Replies
16
Views
2,609

Advert

TrueNAS JBOD Storage Server

Back
Top