EICR question, OLD AC RCD- code 3 or no code? | Page 2 | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss EICR question, OLD AC RCD- code 3 or no code? in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net

Me and my son (who is also an electrician) were having this discussion and he said much the same as you

I then said - in that instance how would you code a voltage operated ELCB- it complied with the regs at the time of the install and you can test it with an RCD tester and the test button works so....

In my opinion we test to the current regs and make a decision to code accordingly

I was on 2 minds on RCDs that are AC type-
1. note on cert and code 3, suggest change (this is what I have been doing till now)

2. note on cert and code 2, suggest change / replacement, EICR unsatisfactory.

Will be getting my SELECT asessment on Friday so will bring it up then, in the meantime I will email NICEIC and SELECT (I am in both) and get an opinion.
Why do you think SELECT or the NICEIC will give a meaningful opinion. You are a competent person use your own judgement.
 
But should not we all at least have a point of reference where most of us agree what this is what a Code should be for an A/C type RCD

I do an EICR for a rental today and I say worse case RCD is code 3 so satisfactory to leave as is
Change or tenant 6 months later so new EICR
A another sparks does the EICR and Codes the same RCD code 2 needs changing forth with

We all look a bit daft
 
The latest BPG#4 already has this given as C3 "A Type AC RCD installed where a Type A RCD is required" on page 19

Now we all know that BPG are guidance, not a replacement for the regs or sensible and professional assessment of the situation and real-world risk, but here it makes perfect sense to me. It could and probably should be improved which C3 implies, but equally it is not likely to present a very high risk in the majority of fault situations that C2 merits.

If it were for an EV or PV system not using SWA cable, etc, and against the MI then you might decide for C2.

Same for TT (so OCPD disconnection not likely) and if evidence of the RCD not working as expected, etc. Here the suggestion by @Pretty Mouth for testing using Type A setting on the MFT sounds reasonable, if it fails to trip in required time then C2 would be hard to argue against.
 
C3 doesn't seem unreasonable and it's a code in which I can see logic. It won't result in an unsatisfactory report and raises a potential issue - what's not to like?
There is nothing to say a C3 shouldn't warrant an unsatisfactory Report.
 
Last edited:
So a Landlord could have had a brand new CU fitted in August 2022 to bring him up to regs and 6 months later which would be March 2023 has a change of tenant and has a Condition report done only to be told his 6 month old RCD is a C3...........NO
Now if he has extra sockets or a new circuit fitted then that's a different matter and code
 
So a Landlord could have had a brand new CU fitted in August 2022 to bring him up to regs and 6 months later which would be March 2023 has a change of tenant and has a Condition report done only to be told his 6 month old RCD is a C3...........NO
Now if he has extra sockets or a new circuit fitted then that's a different matter and code

Improvement recommended, due to regulatory changes. No work needs to be carried out and nothing is potentially dangerous.

Provided the inspector provides an explanation, I can't see a problem.

I'd expect more annoyance if additional work was required for the installation of a new circuit, if CU was changed last August, but coding wouldn't be a factor there.

I'd also add that, while we can not be held responsible for changes to regulations, it would have been remiss of any installer to be fitting type AC RCD protection in August 2022.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So a Landlord could have had a brand new CU fitted in August 2022 to bring him up to regs and 6 months later which would be March 2023 has a change of tenant and has a Condition report done only to be told his 6 month old RCD is a C3...........NO
Now if he has extra sockets or a new circuit fitted then that's a different matter and code
As I have stated already, coding it as a C3 gives the client the option of improving the safety of the installation. Many landlords would want this to be made clear so that they can take responsible action.
And if they decide not to act at this time, C3 can still result in a satisfactory EICR. There has to be a point where we start to look forward in terms of keeping up to date with safety improvements, and not give in to inertia just because it might cost money.
 
Improvement recommended, due to regulatory changes. No work needs to be carried out and nothing is potentially dangerous.

Provided the inspector provides an explanation, I can't see a problem.

I'd expect more annoyance if additional work was required for the installation of a new circuit, if CU was changed last August, but coding wouldn't be a factor there.

I'd also add that, while we can not be held responsible for changes to regulations, it would have been remiss of any installer to be fitting type AC RCD protection in August 2022.
Yes i agree it would be remiss....but i see this a lot because the wholesalers were knocking them out cheap to get rid of stock
 
Improvement recommended, due to regulatory changes. No work needs to be carried out and nothing is potentially dangerous.
...

Absolutely - in just the same way when we find an installation that has the old black and red colours - due to regulatory changes we also must highlight this as a C3 - Improvement Recommended.

After all if the regulations do change making previously acceptable aspects no longer compliant, then it has to be across the board, if we must highlight one particular thing as C3 because it's non-complient we must apply this globally applying C3s on everything that is no longer completely compliant with the latest version of the regs.

Of course the customer doesn't have to address the 10-20 C3s or whatever results from the automatic C3 for anything not completely in line with the most recent regs.

OR

Should we apply engineering judgements based on the current version of the regs?

So red & black wiring, although not in line with current regs, wouldn't actually be an issue whatsoever, - changing to the new colours wouldn't really improve anything from a safety, usability, or end user point of view - so why Recommend an improvement when there actually isn't any real improvement.

Similarly, if the RCD type isn't an issue in this application again if changing it wouldn't really improve anything from a safety, usability, or end user point of view - why Recommend an improvement when there actually isn't any real improvement.

On the other hand if the RCD is on circuits that would benefit from changing the type this would be an improvement, anything from a safety, usability, or end user point of view, so deserves a C3.

On the other, other hand (?) If the RCD is actually being blocked by dc, (or clearly almost certainly will be blocked - say on a circuit where the customer uses a silly "granny charger") - then it becomes a C2


This is my problem btw with many questions about "I have x, what code?" - the answer is C1, C2, C3 or nothing for the same "issue" even on the same site depending upon the circumstances.

An easy example is "premature wiring collapse" - a drooping cable across an entrance is C1, a cable affixed, but which would drop across an exit in the event of a fire, would be C2, a cable affixed, but which would drop along a wall - out of the way in the event of a fire, would be C3, or a cable affixed, but which would drop down just a few inches - well out of harms way in the event of a fire, wouldn't attract anything.
 

Reply to EICR question, OLD AC RCD- code 3 or no code? in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar threads

  • Question
You would think there is already one there, but the builder hasn't mentioned this. He's pretty savvy, and I believe he would have mentioned this...
    • Informative
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Question
If they got a shock then something cannot have been isolated.
Replies
7
Views
1K

Recommended Sponsor News

  • Article
thanks for the clarification. ( also thanks to Dan. ).
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Article
More info on link below http://sbsc.uk.net/
    • Like
2
Replies
22
Views
9K
  • Article
Happy Friday Everyone! Subscribe for more jokes direct to your mailbox or send us your own jokes to be in with a chance of featuring, by clicking...
    • Like
2
Replies
27
Views
6K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top