E
Engineer54
There is (as far as i can see anyway) a problem in the way qualification rating levels are applied to electrical/engineering and higher education qualifications as a whole. For example, how the hell can a PAT or 17th qualification (the latter also being ''open book'') be qualified as having a level 3 rating, exactly the same level as a full C&G 2365/2330/etc or a C&G 2396 having the same level as a 2 or 3 year HNC/D course.
None of it makes any sense to me, it's like pulling and applying level ratings out of the air, they certainly don't reflect the differences in the complexity or the time, effort needed to obtain them...
None of it makes any sense to me, it's like pulling and applying level ratings out of the air, they certainly don't reflect the differences in the complexity or the time, effort needed to obtain them...