Electrical Test sheets & Fudged Figures | Page 3 | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss Electrical Test sheets & Fudged Figures in the Commercial Electrical Advice area at ElectriciansForums.net

I'm going for a lie down in a dark room

I'm asking - do you think its fudged? Without me having to spend to send another body down to the job and get them to retest. Can anyone see ANYTHING suss about the test sheet I've just uploaded?

I am not an electrician in any shape of form, However I do check figures against what the lads send me on the low and what gets printed on a test sheet. Because I am certain both the CM/QS are pulling the wool over the company.

At the end of the day, I'm there to protect the company and the lads on site, So if I don't check these things then i'm as bad as they are.
 
I'm asking - do you think its fudged? Without me having to spend to send another body down to the job and get them to retest. Can anyone see ANYTHING suss about the test sheet I've just uploaded?

I am not an electrician in any shape of form, However I do check figures against what the lads send me on the low and what gets printed on a test sheet. Because I am certain both the CM/QS are pulling the wool over the company.

At the end of the day, I'm there to protect the company and the lads on site, So if I don't check these things then i'm as bad as they are.
Sorry Mate "you are not an Electrician" how do you know what you are checking is correct?
 
RCD test result times
those RCBO are very twitchy I often get figures like that but more like 22 @ 5 x. I think its very hard to believe that dado sockets (cct 8 and other rings) upstairs have an R1/R2 of 0.11 must be a circa 10m cct I would have thought more like 30m total giving approx 0.48. What distance does the circuit go to? And thinking about it what you said about the Zs = Ze + R1/R2 is so spot on in every case it looks like its calculated. They could have faked it better by varying the figures.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The only thing which I doubt is correct is the line/neutral insulation resistance readings which are rarely achievable on an EICR. As for similar rcbo trip times that isn't impossible they are similar, very often Memshield 2 devices will give 39/29 all the time, yesterday I had four in a Wylex NHX all identical. The R1+R2 for the ring finals are incorrect and the Zs for these circuits don't tally with the continuity readings.
 
Sorry Mate "you are not an Electrician" how do you know what you are checking is correct?

Hence me asking for help on this forum. If someone could look at the test sheet I uploaded. Tell me, do you see anything suss.
I sent this to the independent person I use, and he noticed straight away. I had my suspicions when I received it, because the original figures were MISSING.
QS/CM said the electrician did it online, The electrician said he didn't because it crashed mid way, so did a blank handwritten TS for us, and the CM/QS lost it.
 
I'm not disputing they could be valid results, but last week I installed two RCBOs, brand new, identical in every way... operation times were wildly different... all within required times, but radically different. Those on that test sheet look too similar across that many devices.

Edit:-

And having just read Westward's post, I'm happy to bow to you guys who are more experienced with these matters. I've not had much to do with RCBOs in all honesty, they just look too similar.
 
There's a few things that don't add up.
System is TN-S, yet the Ze is is more applicable for TN-C-S.
Test button for RCD on circuit 12 has been operated?
RCD test times don't look right.
I would expect a quicker time on 5x test than on 1x, yet they are either the same or slower?
Nominal voltage is 400V for single phase?
 
As an approximation the Zs for circuit 8 should be about 0.41, circuit 15, 0.42 and circuit 16, 0.43 however the values of end to end continuity look incorrect for the size of conductors unless the cpcs have been incorrectly sized and should be 1.5 as opposed to 2.5.
 
... however the values of end to end continuity look incorrect for the size of conductors unless the cpcs have been incorrectly sized and should be 1.5 as opposed to 2.5.
I think they may have written down it was 4mm / 2.5mm but like you I'm thinking the numbers are closer to 4/1.5 which of course is a standard cable size.
Having read it a few times while consuming this evening's anesthetic IMHO the report is best redone as it has some inconsistencies.
 
The only thing which I doubt is correct is the line/neutral insulation resistance readings which are rarely achievable on an EICR. As for similar rcbo trip times that isn't impossible they are similar, very often Memshield 2 devices will give 39/29 all the time, yesterday I had four in a Wylex NHX all identical. The R1+R2 for the ring finals are incorrect and the Zs for these circuits don't tally with the continuity readings.
Schneider ikq range rcbo s are practically the same when testing the most common ratings 32 amp.
Also the 16amp and 6amp.
 
I think they may have written down it was 4mm / 2.5mm but like you I'm thinking the numbers are closer to 4/1.5 which of course is a standard cable size.
Having read it a few times while consuming this evening's anesthetic IMHO the report is best redone as it has some inconsistencies.
It's surprising how many people think that 4mm twin comes with a 2.5mm cpc.
It's even written on the drum and most of the time the cable 2x 4.0mm 1x 1.5
 
It's surprising how many people think that 4mm twin comes with a 2.5mm cpc.
It's even written on the drum and most of the time the cable 2x 4.0mm 1x 1.5
Not so sure according to the schedule it is T&E as it is referenced as singles in conduit but who knows if that is correct.
 

Reply to Electrical Test sheets & Fudged Figures in the Commercial Electrical Advice area at ElectriciansForums.net

News and Offers from Sponsors

  • Sticky
  • Article
Wicked I've just actually looked through it and it's very smart. Some good stuff in it. There's a tile association company that do a magazine...
Replies
2
Views
290
  • Article
OFFICIAL SPONSORS These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then...
Replies
0
Views
276
  • Article
Hi everyone, Another weekend, another sale! Get ready for colder days with Haverland Radiators, combining efficiency with modern design. Keep...
Replies
0
Views
354

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top