EMdrive funy tory NASA don't know how works bulb

[Pete999]

Select A B or C,which is the correct answer?

A) a sandwich short of a picnic

B) mad as a box of frogs

C) as bright as a neon screwdriver

This question counts as 40% of the score required to pass the nvq exam "how to correctly identify a nutter".

:smilewinkgrin: lol

As switched on as a Electrical Trainee???

 

[Guest111]

As switched on as a Electrical Trainee???

nice try but that was not one of the options.lol,Wonder what he'll start postulating on next? maybe Darwin was wrong with his theory of evolution.

 

[Pete999]

nice try but that was not one of the options.lol,Wonder what he'll start postulating on next? maybe Darwin was wrong with his theory of evolution.

I can't keep up with all this drivel, part way through a bottle of CABERNET SAUVIGNON from Tescos REDUCED FROM £10:99 t0 £5:99 nice

 

[Guest111]

I can't keep up with all this drivel, part way through a bottle of CABERNET SAUVIGNON from Tescos REDUCED FROM £10:99 t0 £5:99 nice

The way he's going maybe he should work on a theory about how the weather affects the cohesion between rubber and tarmac,easily tested by standing in the middle of a busy motorway,

 

[Pete999]

The way he's going maybe he should work on a theory about how the weather affects the cohesion between rubber and tarmac,easily tested by standing in the middle of a busy motorway,

No he's just a twot

 

[maciejmarosz]

No he's just a twot

 

[maciejmarosz]

ORYGINAL NASA RAPORT


NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS) - Anomalous Thrust Production from an RF Test Device Measured on a Low-Thrust Torsion Pendulum



MY OPINION ABOUT RAPORT ( in 2012 i made experiment that solved EM secret !!! )

[video=youtube_share;cSsTWRt0VBA]http://youtu.be/cSsTWRt0VBA[/video]

 

[maciejmarosz]

JOUL/meter^3 = Newton*meter /meter^3 = Newton/meter^2 ( PASCALL !!!)

 

[maciejmarosz]

mirror --------bulb--------mirror >>> 30 km/s

mirror left and right can not register the same preasure !!! WHY

mirror --------bulb--------mirror >>> 30 km/s
......................p1

short time after bulb started signal in point p1 !!!

...mirror --------bulb--------mirror >>> 30 km/s
......................p1

P1 = stationary virtual point !!!

p1..p2..p3..p4..p5..BULB >>> 30 km/s !!!

 

[Guest77]

Afternoon Old Jag.

 

[maciejmarosz]

Problem That NASA solved
(without understad what THEY ARE TESTING !)

ONLY IF ROCKET HAS GOT ABSOLUTE ZERO MOTION EM PREASURE INSIDE ROCKET IS THE SAME
FOR EACH WALL !!! ( we no need stars or other outside objects to describe motion ) CONSTANT LINEAR MOTION !!!!

 

[maciejmarosz]

Marosz my test in 2012 !!!

 

[maciejmarosz]

first pictures
( brightness - photoshop 10 histogram) west ( -30km/s ) and East (+30 km/s )

http://youtu.be/O9k-zidfJZg

Discovery : brightness of pictures West and East are not the same
Reason ? Eart's Velocity 30 km/s = 30 000 000 mm/s
(NIKON 5000d remote start, zero outsite light ,stative, manual set ,
time 10s , F 8 , Iso 200 - /10 cm to bulb / filtre is important !!!)

 

[Kamikaze]

We have been through one of your spacecraft propulsion systems before and I thought we had covered any misconceptions you had. You can not post your ideas up on the internet because someone else will steal it and create an improved and superior version of it. Now, I’m not normally one for putting the flamethrowers to an idea, and your only confined by your self imposed blindness and the walls you build yourself, but when one has an idea, then it has to be put to the test of logic to see if the theory addresses all the problems involved. You don't need to be creative to do that. Look whether the idea has a potentially testable way. Then you see how many of your ideas fit your criteria. Then of the ones left, you look at which is the most simple (Occam's razor) or easy to check (Popper’s critical rationalism). One weapon in the battle is to test the inadequacies of your theory. You see, you get there by filtering out the ideas that have potential via probabilistic reasoning using logic. The problem is Maciej, cameras, torches and light-bulbs don’t actually exist. What you're really seeing is a cloud of elementary particles arranged light bulb-like. The only objects in the universe are simples and the objects that we think are composite don't strictly speaking exist. These simples may either be extended or unextended in space, but that is another story. Ok now just to clear up any misconception anyone has about Einstein’s theory of relativity. Most fields are best thought of as pervading three dimensional space and time, except for the graviton field. And general relativity is the 11th commandment. Thou shalt not exceed the speed of light. It sets the cosmic speed limit. Einstein never said nothing can travel faster then the speed of light. He said nothing can accelerate to the speed of light. The two concepts are different. Under the special theory of relativity, a particle which has rest mass with subluminal velocity needs infinite energy to accelerate to the speed of light. However, special relativity does not forbid the existence of something that can travel faster than light. The theory provides a couple of loopholes, such as wormholes and space warps. The idea of a space warp comes from the fact that in general relativity space can expand and contract at any speed. It has no speed limit! So in theory that would allow for massive distances to be travelled very quickly. Just like if the earth moved from under your feet so you could get to the pub without ever having to walk there. So you could in theory make a journey down to your local boozer in a time measured in seconds. All the while, never locally exceeding the speed of light. What happens is, space compresses and expands around an object in warp, resulting in space-time shifting around the item. This repositions the item without ever actually moving it. But even this is all yesterdays science. At the moment there are some people doing incredibly subtle experiments. They can get all the information about a single particle, its position and its direction and then teleport that information to somewhere else. That research is still happening on single photons. I think doing the same for a whole person in a Star Trek style teleportation device using a torch certainly isn't going to happen in our lifetime. I was at a science convention once and asked the actor who played Sulu in Star Trek "How do the Heisenberg compensators work?". He replied "Very well thank you" and walked away...lol. Now give that light-bulb a bit of a lick and then the purple dragon will tell you if it's better than LSD. :biggrinjester:

 

[maciejmarosz]

Einstein told that we can not recognize different between gravitation and acceleration