I've got a new job starting next month and my current employer is saying I have to pay for an IPAF course I did last November
I had to sign for the card when company received it, and i just put a scribble on it ,
I was told it was just saying I'd received the card, never read it ( my bad) and its come to light that I was actually signing saying that if I was to leave within 12 months that I would be liable for the ÂŁ170.00 fees
I know this is common practice these days as long as the rules are followed but I've never had to sign anything like this at work tbh I didn't realise they could do it!
However I don't think it's fair to be charged fully for something for which the company may have claimed something back from the taxman ,
plus the company has had the benefit of me being able to use mewps etc for work for nearly 8 mths
I've looked at various legal sites and this contract is only valid with several inclusions
1 that the employee is clear that they are liable
2 the employee has to agree to the money being taken out at source
3 that costs should be agreed to be on a sliding scale as they've had the benefit of use of the training.
None of which has been explained in any form by the company to anyone.
Not neccesarily looking to get out of this just because of the money I just feel that they haven't done things properly and it's not fair
But they are leaving the door open for me and I would prefer to do this without burning bridges if possible
Has anyone had a similar experience or any advice on this
I had to sign for the card when company received it, and i just put a scribble on it ,
I was told it was just saying I'd received the card, never read it ( my bad) and its come to light that I was actually signing saying that if I was to leave within 12 months that I would be liable for the ÂŁ170.00 fees
I know this is common practice these days as long as the rules are followed but I've never had to sign anything like this at work tbh I didn't realise they could do it!
However I don't think it's fair to be charged fully for something for which the company may have claimed something back from the taxman ,
plus the company has had the benefit of me being able to use mewps etc for work for nearly 8 mths
I've looked at various legal sites and this contract is only valid with several inclusions
1 that the employee is clear that they are liable
2 the employee has to agree to the money being taken out at source
3 that costs should be agreed to be on a sliding scale as they've had the benefit of use of the training.
None of which has been explained in any form by the company to anyone.
Not neccesarily looking to get out of this just because of the money I just feel that they haven't done things properly and it's not fair
But they are leaving the door open for me and I would prefer to do this without burning bridges if possible
Has anyone had a similar experience or any advice on this