View the thread, titled "EV Charger Earth Rod" which is posted in UK Electrical Forum on Electricians Forums.

I have completed the 2919 course and was told during this that all chargers would require a TT connection, whether solely for the charger or as part of the full installation. Since completing the course a while ago now, I have discussed with some electricians who say they don't install an earth rod when the property is TN-C-S. What is the general view on this?
Also, the instructions for a Tesla charger says it is constantly monitoring for earth faults and over current, switching the charger off and on accordingly, does this mitigate the requirement for an earth rod? Because it is looking out for a lost neutral with a PME system? My argument is the charger could get confused thinking a main bonding conductor was the new supply to earth but we wouldn't deem this OK.

I will always install to what I believe is correct within the BS and the course I completed, but it gets confusing when you hear differing opinions within the trade. I look forward to hearing your views and welcome any suggested previous posts.

I hope everyone coping as well as they can be during the Covid-19 out break and my thoughts are with those who have lost loved ones and those who are struggling financially. Stay safe.
 
Thank you Dave, but not really helpful. I can only go by what I believe to be the correct information, which is, if you have a PME supply, the charger requires an earth rod.

Actually you don't have to trust to your beliefs, you can read the requirements in black and white in BS7671:2018 and the first ammendment to BS7671:2018
I don't have a copy of the first ammendment as it only relates to EV chargers and I don't install them so I can't really comment on it, however as an EV charger installer you obviously already have a copy of the first ammendment and have fully read and understood it.
 
Hi - the scenario of a charger outside with an installation that’s PME requires some thought. And the answer can depend on the exact spec of charger to be installed and site factors. As @davesparks has mentioned there has been an update to the regs in this area and it’s available to read free of charge :) .

https://electrical.------.org/bs-7671/updates-to-18th-edition/
 
Come on guys, you've not much else to do at the moment. This is a forum for discussion. Before you post, you might wish to read the notes in the reply box, before replying.

I'm just interested on how this ev charging thing will progress, asked myself recently;


You might find listening E5 Group Podcast
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YPqMVk0KgY4&list=PLKu40BuY2wcR5Ap6EBe8oVeSoKJ-ktRUH&index=29
[automerge]1585385291[/automerge]
Here's a quite long thread on a similar vein;

 
Last edited:
Ok, so I have thoroughly studied the Amendment again, notably 722.411.4.1 (iv) which says:
Protection against electric shock in a single-phase installation is provided by a device which electrically
disconnects the vehicle from the live conductors of the supply and from protective earth in accordance with Regulation 543.3.3.101 (ii) within 5 s in the event of the utilisation voltage at the charging point, between the line and neutral conductors, being greater than 253 V rms or less than 207 V rms. The device shall provide isolation and be selected in accordance with Table 537.4. Equivalent means of functionality could be included within the charging equipment. Closing or resetting of the device shall be possible only if the voltage between line and neutral conductors is in the range 207 to 253 V rms.


Which I read as basically certain chargers are designed to do this.

I cannot find any details within the Tesla manufacturers install guide stating their charger conforms to BS7671:2018 Amendment 1 regulation 722.411.4.1 (iv)

I would be comfortable to use this as a strong argument for the provision of an earth electrode still (I can only comment on a Tesla charger currently because I dont have every other charger in front of me).
 
You could achieve protection with two RCDs in series:
  • First one is the normal 2-pole RCD/RCBO that you would use to protect the AC supply to any outside sort of unit. Would protect against typical L-E faults.
  • Second one feeds L, N and E through a "4-pole" RCD so in the event of CNE open and someone touching the car, the shock current is detected on the E line and it then trips isolating all wires. (L & N should always balance, here they are needed simply so they are isolated simultaneously with the earth disconnection, but L-E fault will not trip in this case)
No earth rods and risk to buried services, no worries about being on the wrong phase and not seeing enough of an out-of-range voltage to trip the likes of the Matt:e boxes.
 
Last edited:
Have a look at the MyEnergi Zappi car charger no need for earth rod no need for rcd and moniters the current so that it wont exceed the main fuse
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DnEG8jhOHBw

Was gong to mention Zappi, thing that irks me no end is that they've got current monitoring and wizardry that makes them the best - no issue with that, the bit I do take issue with is the tech either not being shared without a price tag - If I were IET et all I'd be down that patent office for the inner workings or not being openly shared with Reg bodies, he'll write them a cheque if that's what it comes to.

I get R&D ain't free but when you have a game chsnging bit of tech like this and don't share it - yet harp on about caring for the environment and EV sector - that is wrong
 
Was gong to mention Zappi, thing that irks me no end is that they've got current monitoring and wizardry that makes them the best - no issue with that, the bit I do take issue with is the tech either not being shared without a price tag - If I were IET et all I'd be down that patent office for the inner workings or not being openly shared with Reg bodies, he'll write them a cheque if that's what it comes to.

I get R&D ain't free but when you have a game chsnging bit of tech like this and don't share it - yet harp on about caring for the environment and EV sector - that is wrong
Totally agree.....does seem a bit naughty.because it will make the other chargers redundant
 

Reply to the thread, titled "EV Charger Earth Rod" which is posted in UK Electrical Forum on Electricians Forums.

Best EV Chargers by Electrical2Go! The official electric vehicle charger supplier.

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

Daily, weekly or monthly email

Back
Top