Yes, DPG, it is the future! But it is here, now!
OK, they want to ban diesel cars, and make it very expensive, especially in Inner London, wherever that hell may be...but the powers that be simply want to tax the private consumer, while the belching buses and lorries continue to pollute to a much higher degree.
Just try telling Eddie Stobart (!) to replace his entire fleet with electric vehicles, DPD, UPS, FedEx, every bus company...the average motorist was tempted, actually encouraged, to go diesel, a few years ago, and now we are being targeted as an easy revenue-point. Yes, i could change my diesel car for an electric one, but to get the same performance, with limited charging options, I would have to buy a Tesla...and i simply can't afford one. I could buy a petrol car, but still I will be targetted to go greener. No!
The private/light commercial guys are being asked to cough up (no pun intended) yet again, while the major polluting vehicles are ignored. Commerce depends on road transport by diesel trucks, buses, whatever...construction depends on diesel machinery, JCBs RBs, Drots, D8s, any amount of diesel-guzzling machinery, yet a tiny minority of road users are being hit with the mantra of "go green"...while certain countries continue to open coal-fire power stations at the rate of 100 a year. We are not the villains, we are the victims.
Thus, who better to hassle than the tax-paying individuals? We are easily identifiable, we cannot avoid the taxes, we have no "clout", we just have to pay up or shut up.
I have looked at EV technology. I have actually explored the possibility of buying an electric car, but the cost of installing a charging point at my home is enough to buy me a year's worth..no, 3 years' worth of diesel, and as a pensioner I have decided to stick with the technology I have. OK, the road tax is higher, but the "cost to change" is significant too. I'm fed up being dictated to, while other sectors are left alone.
I know I will be labelled as Can't Use New Technology (the acronym is clear) but until we tax cyclists too, and make them pay for insurance and road use, and impose number plates on them, I will simply continue to use my diesel car until the authorities tighten the emmission laws so much that my car will fail the MOT, no matter how efficient my car actually is...and that move is coming. Will they impose the same restrictions on commercial vehicles? Will they impose such laws on the big commercial operators that pay into the Party coffers? Will they simply pursue the wee people who try to make a living? You know the answer.
Getting rid of 1% of the problem of pollution is no result at all. Before any of you argue that it's 5%, or 10%...I don't care! It's a very small percentage, and insignificant in the fight against pollution. There are many worse offenders, but we are being persecuted...
Rant over!
for now...
and as the late, great Alistair Cooke, used to say after his radio broadcast "Letter From America"..."if you have been...thank you for listening"
OK, they want to ban diesel cars, and make it very expensive, especially in Inner London, wherever that hell may be...but the powers that be simply want to tax the private consumer, while the belching buses and lorries continue to pollute to a much higher degree.
Just try telling Eddie Stobart (!) to replace his entire fleet with electric vehicles, DPD, UPS, FedEx, every bus company...the average motorist was tempted, actually encouraged, to go diesel, a few years ago, and now we are being targeted as an easy revenue-point. Yes, i could change my diesel car for an electric one, but to get the same performance, with limited charging options, I would have to buy a Tesla...and i simply can't afford one. I could buy a petrol car, but still I will be targetted to go greener. No!
The private/light commercial guys are being asked to cough up (no pun intended) yet again, while the major polluting vehicles are ignored. Commerce depends on road transport by diesel trucks, buses, whatever...construction depends on diesel machinery, JCBs RBs, Drots, D8s, any amount of diesel-guzzling machinery, yet a tiny minority of road users are being hit with the mantra of "go green"...while certain countries continue to open coal-fire power stations at the rate of 100 a year. We are not the villains, we are the victims.
Thus, who better to hassle than the tax-paying individuals? We are easily identifiable, we cannot avoid the taxes, we have no "clout", we just have to pay up or shut up.
I have looked at EV technology. I have actually explored the possibility of buying an electric car, but the cost of installing a charging point at my home is enough to buy me a year's worth..no, 3 years' worth of diesel, and as a pensioner I have decided to stick with the technology I have. OK, the road tax is higher, but the "cost to change" is significant too. I'm fed up being dictated to, while other sectors are left alone.
I know I will be labelled as Can't Use New Technology (the acronym is clear) but until we tax cyclists too, and make them pay for insurance and road use, and impose number plates on them, I will simply continue to use my diesel car until the authorities tighten the emmission laws so much that my car will fail the MOT, no matter how efficient my car actually is...and that move is coming. Will they impose the same restrictions on commercial vehicles? Will they impose such laws on the big commercial operators that pay into the Party coffers? Will they simply pursue the wee people who try to make a living? You know the answer.
Getting rid of 1% of the problem of pollution is no result at all. Before any of you argue that it's 5%, or 10%...I don't care! It's a very small percentage, and insignificant in the fight against pollution. There are many worse offenders, but we are being persecuted...
Rant over!
for now...
and as the late, great Alistair Cooke, used to say after his radio broadcast "Letter From America"..."if you have been...thank you for listening"
Last edited: